FLORIN
WEBSITE ©
JULIA BOLTON HOLLOWAY,
AUREO
ANELLO ASSOCIATION, 1997-2010: FLORENCE'S
'ENGLISH'
CEMETERY
|| BIBLIOTECA E
BOTTEGA FIORETTA MAZZEI
|| ELIZABETH
BARRETT BROWNING || FLORENCE
IN SEPIA || BRUNETTO
LATINO, DANTE
ALIGHIERI AND GEOFFREY
CHAUCER
|| E-BOOKS
|| ANGLO-ITALIAN
STUDIES || CITY
AND BOOK
I,
II,
III,
IV || NON-PROFIT
GUIDE TO COMMERCE IN
FLORENCE
|| AUREO
ANELLO, CATALOGUE
'HENGIST' HORNE'S
A NEW SPIRIT OF THE AGE AND
FLORENCE'S 'ENGLISH' CEMETERY

Benjamin Haydon, Wordsworth on Helvellyn
THOMAS SOUTHWOOD SMITH || LEONARD
HORNER || WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR || FRANCES TROLLOPE || ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING ||
Richard 'Hengist' 'Farthing' Horne (NPG
2168), whom Elizabeth
Barrett Browning never met, conceived the idea of writing a sequel to
William Hazlitt's The Spirit of the
Age, which had been published in 1825, and which had included
essays on Jeremy Bentham, William Godwin, Samuel Coleridge, Sir Walter
Scott, Lord Byron, Robert Southey, William Wordsworth, William
Wilberforce, Leigh Hunt, Charles Lamb.
Titled 'A New Spirit of the Age',
Horne's
two
volumes
created
a sort of Wikipedia of the living writers
and
shapers of events
in the 1840s, a kind of mutual admiration (though sometimes
villification) society, in which these figures themselves
wrote articles about each other. Unlike Hazlitt's work,
these volumes now
included women, as both subjects and as their editors. Among
their
portraits
-
for
the 1844
first
edition also supplied these in fine engravings - are those of Charles
Dickens, Southwood Smith (NPG
D8396),
Walter
Savage
Landor, William and Mary
Howitt, Mrs Trollope, William Wordsworth, Leigh Hunt, Alfred Tennyson,
Harriet Martineau, Mrs Jameson, Miss E.B. Barrett (our Elizabeth
Barrett Browning), Robert Browning, Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton, Mrs
Shelley and Thomas Carlyle. These sixteen
figures were all associated
with each other.
Of these figures, serendipitously, Southwood Smith, Walter
Savage
Landor, Mrs Trollope, and Elizabeth Barrett Browning, all find their
resting places in Florence's 'English' Cemetery, and Leonard Horner
almost does so, with Leigh Hunt writing the
epitaph for Southwood Smith's tomb, Anna Jameson having accompanied the
Brownings from Paris to Pisa on their elopement, Elizabeth
in Lady Geraldine's Courtship
having proposed marriage to both Tennyson and Browning, Charles
Dickens'
mistress'
sister
being
first governess to the orphaned Bice at
Theodosia Trollope's death and then second wife to Fanny Trollope's
oldest son, Thomas Adolphus Trollope, Isa Blagden nursing Lytton's son,
Robert, who became Viceroy of India, back to health at Bagni di Lucca,
then caring for the newly orphaned Pen Browning and, later,
orphaned
Bice Trollope
at Bellosguardo, as well as for the demented Walter Savage Landor near
Siena. Elizabeth's room in Wimpole Street was hung with portraits, one
of 'Wordsworth upon Helvellyn', painted by the suicide Benjamin Haydon (NPG
1857),
and two engravings from A New Spirit
of
the Age - of Tennyson and of Browning. These last two Elizabeth
would
bring, on her elopement, to Italy.
Richard
Horne's A New Spirit
of the Age combines the account of Thomas Southwood Smith with
that
of
Lord
Ashley.
THOMAS
SOUTHWOOD
SMITH
(NPG
D8396)
To plunge into the infection of
hospitals; to survey the mansions of sorrow and pain; to take the gauge
and dimensions of misery, depression, and contempt; to remember the
forgotten, and to attend to the neglected. Burke
he spirit of the philosophy of
antiquity offers a striking contrast to that of the present age in the
tendency of the latter to diffuse itself among the people. In the whole
range of scientific or demonstrable knowledge which has been grasped by
human intelligence, we have now nothing approaching to the old Esoteric
and Exoteric doctrine. With results at least as brilliant as those
which have distinguished any former age, the instruments of induction
and experiment continue to be used to extend the boundaries of
knowledge; but that which no former age has witnessed is the energy
which is now put forth to make the doctrines of science known and to
reach the masses how to apply them to their advantage. The men at
present in possession of the key of knowledge, value it chiefly as it
enables them to unlock treasures for universal diffusion, and estimate
their own claim to distinction and honour by the measure in which they
have enriched the world. This spirit is strongly exemplified in the
writings of Dr. Southwood Smith, and the course of his public life. By
nature and education he seems to have been formed rather for the
retirement and contemplation of the study, than the active business of
the world. The bent of his mind led him at an unusually early age to
the
investigation of the range of subjects that relate more or less
directly to intellectual and moral philosophy; and, as not unfrequently
happens, the efforts of those around him, to give to his pursuits a
widely different direction only increased his love for those studies.
Having determined on the practice of medicine as a profession, Dr.
Southwood Smith found in the sciences which now demanded his attention
and still more in the structure and functions of organized beings,
studies congenial to his taste, and for which his previous intellectual
pursuits and habits had prepared him. The contemplation of the
wonderful processes which constitute life, the exquisite mechanism, as
far as that mechanism can be traced by which they are performed, the
surprising adjustments and harmonies by which in a creature like man
such diverse and opposite actions are brought into relation with each
other and made to work in subserviency and co-operation, and the Divine
object of all - the communication of sensation and intelligence as the
inlets and instruments of happiness, afforded the highest satisfaction
to his mind. But this beautiful world, into whose intimate workings his
eye now searched, presented itself to his view as a demonstration that
the Creative Power is infinite in goodness, and seemed to afford, as
if from the essential elements and profoundest depths of nature, a
proof of His love. Under these impressions, he wrote, in 1814,
during the intervals of his college studies, the 'Divine Government', a
work which at once brought him into notice and established his
reputation as an original eloquent writer. It has now gone through many
editions, and has been widely circulated, and read with the deepest
interest by persons of all classes and creeds; there is nothing
sectarian in it; dealing only with great and universal principles, it
comprehends humanity and in some respects indeed the whole sensitive
and organic creation. The style is singularly lucid; its tone is
earnest, rising frequently into strains
of touching and pathetic eloquence; a heartfelt conviction of the truth
of every thought that is put into words breathes throughout the whole,
and a buoyant and youthful spirit pervades it, imparting to it a charm
which so rivets the attention of the reader as to render him in many
instances unable to put down the book till finished, as if he had been
engaged in an exciting novel. Had the work been written at a maturer
age, some of this charm must have vanished, and given place to a deeper
consciousness of the woe and pain that mingle with the joys of the
present state. But as it is, it has been no unimportant instrument in
the hands of those among whom it has chanced to fall, in keeping
distinctly before the view the greater happiness, as an end, to the
attainment of which the direct and only means must often be pain. Many instances are on record
of the solace it has communicated to the mourner, and the hope it has
inspired in the mind when on the brink of despair. While divines of the
Church have read and expressed their approbation of it, it has
attracted the attention of some of the most distinguished poets of the
day: Byron and Moore have recorded their admiration of it, and it
appears to have been the constant companion of Crabbe, and to have
soothed and brightened his last moments.
After the completion of his medical terms, Dr. Southwood Smith spent
several years in the practice of his profession at a provincial town in
the west of England, near his place of birth, and in the midst of a
small but highly cultivated and affectionate circle of friends,
devoting himself with unabated ardour to his favourite studies. On his
removal to London, he attached himself to one of the great metropolitan
hospitals, that he might enlarge his experience in his profession. He
was soon appointed physician to the Eastern Dispensary, and in a few
years afterwards, to the London Fever Hospital. Called upon by the
latter appointment to treat on so large a scale one of the most
formidable diseases which the physician has to encounter, he applied
himself to its study with a zeal not to be abated by two attacks of the
malady in his own person, so severe that his life on each occasion was
despaired of. The result of several years' laborious investigation is
given in his 'Treatise on Fever', which was at once pronounced to be
'one of the most able of the philosophical works that have aided the
advancement of the science of medicine during the last half century';
and its reputation has risen with time. It has had a wide circulation
on the Continent, over India and in America, in the mediecal schools of
which it has become a textbook, while in this country high medical
authority has pronounced it to be 'the best work on fever that ever
flowed from the pen of physician in any age or country'.
Dr. Southwood Smith assisted in the formation of the Westminster Review, and wrote the
article on 'Education' in the first number. For many years he was a
regular contributor, and it was here that his paper on the state of the
Anatomical Schools first appeared, which attracted so much attention
that it was reprinted in form of a pamphlet, under the title of 'The
Use of the Dead for the Living'. In this form it passed through several
editions, and a copy was sent to every member of both houses of
Parliament. The evils that must necessarily result to the country by
withholding from the medical profession the means of obtaining
anatomical and physiological knowledge were so clearly pointed out in
this pamphlet, and the perils inseparable from the permission of such a
class as the resurrection-men (the most horrible results of which were
soon afterwards actually realized), so forcibly depicted, while at the
same time a remedy adequate to meet the difficulties of the case was
suggested and explained, that the Legislature was induced to take up
the subject, and after appointing a Committee of Inquiry, to pass the
existing law, which has put an effectual stop to the trade of
body-snatching and the horrible crime of Barking; but, unfortunately,
from a defect in the Act, the anatomical schools are often placed,
though quite unnecessarily, in a state of considerable embarrassment.
Dr. Smith laboured with equal earnestness, but less success, to obtain
a revision of the present regulations concerning quarantine, which he
regards as unworthy of a country that has made any progress in science,
having their origin in ignorance and superstition worthy of the Middle
Ages; aiming at an object which is altogether chimerical, and which, if
it had any real existence, would be just as much beyond human power as
the control of the force and direction of the winds. Yet these
regulations are still allowed grievously to embarrass commerce, at the
cost of hundreds of thousands of pounds annually.
The articles on 'Physiology and Medicine' in the early numbers of the
Penny Cyclopedia are from the
pen of this author, and the success of
the treatise on 'Animal Physiology', written at the request of the
Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, suggested the idea of
treating this subject in a still more elaborate and comprehenseive
manner, and led to the publication of the 'Philosophy of Health'. The
first words of the introduction to this work thus express the
comprehensive nature of the subject which it embraces: -
The object of the present work is
to give a brief and plain account of the structure and functions of the
Body, chiefly with reference to health and disease. This is intended to
be introductory to an account of the constitution of the Mind, chiefly
with reference to the development and direction of its powers.
The two volumes already published, aim at establishing a series of
general rules for health (the word 'health' being applied in its widest
sense), by popularly explaining the nature of the substances of which
the physical part of man is compounded; describing the various
structures and organs of the body, and the
different functions they perform; and deducing thence the laws which
the creature is enjoined by the principles of its creation to obey.
This is merely the basis of a higher philosophy, which rising from the
physical, shall, in regular sequence, proceed to the mental, trace
their mutual relation and dependence, and endeavour to deduce from the
exposition of this nature of each - as far as their nature can be
comprehended by mortal intelligence - the rules for the utmost
development and progression of both.
The first volume comprises a most interesting view of life in all
organized bodies, commencing from an imperceptible germ, and ascending
from the lichen on the rock, to man himself. The distinction between
the two great divisions of organized life, between that which only
grows - the organic, and that which not only grows, but moves and feels
- the animal superadded to the organic - is traced with the hand of a
master. Equally masterly is the rapid view of the means adopted to
render voluntary motion possible; the complication of structure
requisite to that one faculty; the apparatus constructed to produce
sensation; the elevation of every faculty down to the lowest, by the
addition of each higher faculty; the indispensable necessity and uses
of pain not only to health, but to life itself; and the indication of
the processes by which nature trains the mind to perceive and think.
The concluding passage of this portion of the work is one of remarkable
power, in which a general view is exhibited of the physiological
progress of a human being, from its first appearance in the embryo
state, until the final extinction of life, and the subjection of the
inanimate body to the material laws which are to decompose it.
Expositions of the function of circulation, digestion, and nutrition
follow, equally characterized by fullness, clearness, and conciseness.
The style of this work is distinguished by terseness and simplicity; it
would be difficult to find a useless word, and very few epithets are
employed, as though the number and variety of ideas to be imparted
rendered condensation essential: in the arrangment there is great
precision, subject after subject arising gradually and naturally. Few
technical terms are employed, and a full explanation is given to those
which are introduced. A perfect command of the subject is evinced
throughout: and its exposition is at once profound and simple,
calculated alike to instruct the ignorant, and by the striking nature
of the description and the novelty of their applications, to interest
even those to whom the facts are not new. Much of the matter contained
in these volumes is original, and even that which is taken out of the
common treasury of science is disposed in a new manner, and exhibited
in new relations of great interest and importance. Scattered phenomena
which might be culled out of various works on Anatomy, Physiology, and
Mental Philosophy, are here brought together and systematized;
displayed as a series, traced from their germs, and followed onwards to
their highest manifestations; arranged so as to show their relation to
one another, and their influence one on the other, thence deducing the
means of developing the united powers towards their utmost point of
progression.
Many felicitous instances of scientific generalization and of eloquent
description and appeal might be referred to in exemplification. It has
been well said by a philosophical reviewer, that the '"Natural History
of Death", as a composition, has much of that singular and melancholy
beauty wherewith a painter of genius would invest the personification
of mortality'. The following appeal to mothers as been compared to the
fervid eloquence of Rousseau, which aroused women to a sense of the
physical obligations of the maternal character; but here the earnest
call is for mental and moral exertion: -
I appeal to every woman whose eye
may rest on these pages. I ask of you, what has ever been done for you
to enable you to understand the physical and mental constitution of
that human nature, the care of which is imposed on you? In what part of
the course of your education was instruction of this kind introduced?
Over how large a portion of your education did it extend? Who were your
teachers? What have you profited by their lessons? What progress have
you made in the acquisition of the requisite information? Were you at
this moment to undertake the guidance of a new-born infant to health,
knowledge, goodness and happiness, how would you set about the task?
How would you regulate the influence of external agents upon its
delicate, tender, and highly irritable organs, in such a manner as to
obtain from them healthful stimulation, and avoid destructive
excitement? What natural and moral objects would you select as the best
adapted to exercise and develop its opening faculties? What feelings
would you check, and what cherish? How would you excite aims; how would
you apply motives? How would you avail yourself of pleasure as a final
end, or as the means to some further end? And how would you deal with
the no less formidable instrument of pain? What is your own physical,
intellectual, and moral state, as especially fitting you for this
office? What is the measure of your own self-control, without a large
portion of which no human being ever yet exerted over the infant mind
any considerable influence for good?
This earnest passage at once serves to give an idea of the style of the
work and to explain one of its chief aims: and with it the present
short account of the 'Philosophy of Health' must conclude, but not
before a hope has been expressed that an undertaking so important and
so well begun, will not much longer be left unfinished.
Dr. Southwood Smith was the friend and physician of Bentham. The
venerable and unaffected philanthropist, fully appreciating the
importance of anatomical science, and lamenting the prejudice against
dissection, gave his own body to Dr. Smith, charging him to devote it
to the ordinary purposes of science. His friend fulfilled his desire,
and delivered the first lecture over the body - with a clear and
unfaltering voice, but with a face as white as that of the dead
philosopher before him. Alive, so cheerful and serene - serene for ever
now and nothing more. The lecture was delivered on June 9, 1832, in the
Webb-street School of Anatomy. Dr. Smith availed himself of the
occasion, and his biographer has made this lecture the concluding part
of the Memoir which has been prefixed to the uniform edition of
Bentham's works just published. The head and face were preserved by a
peculiar process, but the latter being found painful in expression, is
covered with a wax mask admirably executed and a correct likeness. The
skeleton also was preserved; and the whole clothed in the ordinary
dress worn by the philosopher (according to his own express desire),
presenting him as nearly as possible as he was while living. Seated
smiling in a large mahogany case with a glass front, the homely figure,
with its long snow-white hair, broad-brimmed hat, and thick ash-plant
walking-stick, resides with
Dr. Southwood Smith, and may be seen by any one who takes an interest
in the writings and character of Jeremy Bentham.
See also
http://www.sijmen.nl/filo/bentham.html
The University of London treasures the
'auto-icon' of Jeremy Bentham as its founder (above). We recall that
Robert Browning's Dissenting father participated in the founding of
that University in order to enroll his son. Robert Browning only
attended that university one day, Balliol's honorary degree being more
to his liking.
The essay next discusses Lord Ashley, noting that
Southwood Smith served on the commission concerning Child Labour.
Lord Ashley, the eldest son of the Earl of Shaftsbury and member
for Dorsertshire, commenced his career in that cuse with which his
public life has become identified, by undertaking the charge of Mr
Sadler's Factory Bill in the House of Commons. The invention of the
spinning-jenny and the power-loom not only altered the whole process of
manufactures, but withdrew the operatives from their own dwellings, and
collected them in numbers in great buildings called Factories. The
invention of machinery was attended with another result: it created a
demand for the comparatively inexpensive labour of children, their
small fingers being found best adapted to to work in combination
with it. Very young children, of both sexes, were therefore employed in
great numbers, together with adult labourers, and as their servants,
and were moreover compelle to work the same number of hours, whether
those amounted to twelve, fourteen, or sixteen, or even all night. It
was alleged that children of tender ages placed under these unnatural
circumstances were grievously and irreparably injured in their physical
constitution; that they were cruelly treated by their taskmasters; that
their morals were early corrupted; that they were growing up in a state
of absolute ignorance. It was universaly admitted that the efforts
which the Legislature had hitherto made for their protection had
failed, and every existing enactment become a dead letter. It was in
this state of things that Lord Ashley, in 1833, took charge of Mr
Sadler's Bill, the object of which was to limit the hours of work, of
all under eighteen, in Factories, to ten hours daily. This was met by
the objection that such a measure must necessarily put the same limit
on the labour of adults. A Commission was accordingly appointed; first
to ascertain the facts of the case as regarded the children, and,
secondly, to inquire whether it would not be practicable to devise a
measure for the protection of children without interfering with the
liberty of all the operatives. Fifteen Commissioners were appointed and
divided into five sections, each consisting of three Commissioners (two
civil and one medical) and of these Mr Thomas Tooke, Mr Chadwick, and
Dr Southwood smith, formed the Central Board, to direct the inquiry and
report the result. Their report was: -
That the children employed in all
the principal branches of manufacture throughout the kingdom work the
same number of hours as the adults; that the effects of such labour, in
great numbers of instances, are permanent deterioration of the
physicial constitution, the production of disease, often wholly
irremediable, and the exclusion by means of excessive fatigue from the
means of obtaining education. That children at the ages when they
suffer these injuries not being free agents, but let out to hire, their
wages being appropriated by their parents, therefore a case is made out
for the interference of the legislature in their behalf.
The Factory Act of 1833 was
founded on this Report. and four Inspectors and a considerable number
of Sub-Inspectors were appointed to enforce obedience to its
enactments. The results are highly important.
The existing Act, which fixes the youngest age at which children
can be employed, and the extent of their hours of labour, and which
requires education as a condition of employment, is (unlike its
predecessors) obeyed; and although the clause in the Bill prepared by
the Commissioners providing for the erection of schools and the payment
of teachers, was struck out in the House of Lords on the motion of the
Earl of Shaftsbury, Lord Ashley's father, yet with all its
imperfections the present Act has led to an amelioration in the
treatment and an improvement in the physical condition and moral
character of this vast juvenile population, such as was never before
effected by an Act of Parliament; while the benefits resulting from it
to all parties, the employers no less than the employed, are not only
rapidly multiplying and extending, but are becoming more and more the
subjects of general acknowledgement and gratulation. There is reason to
believe that the total number employed in factory labour in the United
Kingdom is little short of 1,000,000.*
________
*From a Return furnished by Mr
Saunders, one of the Factory
Inspectors,
it appears that in his district alone, which is by no means one of the
largest, the total number employed in Factory labour is 106,509. Among
these there are 45.958 young persons and children coming under the
regulations of the Factory Act. It appears, further, that while there
were before the present Act, as far as the Inspector could learn, only
two schools in his whole district, at which about 200 children may have
been educated, the actual number at present attending schools is 9,316.
The Factory Act has diminished the number of young children, as
operatives, and increased that of adults.
_________
New fields of labour had opened to Lord Ashley at every step of
his progress. He had already earned the honourable designation of the
general guardian of the children of the poor, as the Lord Chancellor is
of the children of the rich. He was satisfied that there were
oppressions and sufferings of an aggravated character, and on a large
scale, in occupations widely different from those of the factory, and
which required investigation the more because the places of work, in
which some of the most important of these employments are carried on,
are widely inacessible to the public. The apprehension inseperable from
a mind, at once earnest and diffident, that he should fail to elicit
the truth, and to place it so strongly before the public and the
legislature, as to command grievance, was strongly marked in the
opening of his speech on August 4, 1840, for the appointment of a
Commission of Inquiry into the Employment of Children in Mines,
Collieries, and other occupations not regulated by the Factory Acts.
'It is, Sir', said he, 'with
feelings
somewhat akin to despair that I now rise to bring before the House, the
motion of which I have given notice. I cannot but entertain misgivings,
that I shall not be able to bring under the attention of the House this
subject, which has now occupied so large a portion of my public life,
and which are concentrated in one
hour, the labours of years.
I have long contemplated this effort which I am now making; I had long
resolved that, so soon as I could see the Factory children, as it were,
safe in harbour, I would undertake a new task . . . I am now
endeavouring to obtain an inquiry into the actual circumstances and
condition of another large part of our juvenile population . . . I
wish,' continued he, 'to preserve and cherish the physical energies of
these poor children, and to cultivate and improve their moral part,
both of which, be they taken seperately or conjointly, are essential to
the peace, security, and progress of the empire . . . It is instructive
to observe, how we compel, as it were, vice and misery with one hand,
and endeavour to repress them with the other; but the whole course of
our manufacturing system tends to these results; you engage children
from their earliest and tenderest years in these long, painful, and
destructive occupations; when they have approached to manhood, they
have outgrown their employments, and they are turned upon the world
without moral, without professional education; the business they have
learned, avails them nothing; to what can they turn their hands for a
maintenance? - the children, for instance, who have been taught to make
pins, having reached fourteen or fifteen years of age, are unfit to
make pins any longer; to procure an honest livelihood then becomes to
them almost impossible; the governors of prisons will tell you, the
relieving-officers will tell you, that the vicious resort to plunder
and prostitution; the rest sink down into a hopeless pauperism. I
desire to remove these spectacles of suffering and oppression from the
eyes of the poorer classes, or at least to ascertain if we can do so;
these things perplex the peaceable, and exasperate the discontented;
they have a tendency to render capital odious, for wealth is known to
them only by its oppressions; they judge of it by what they see
immediately around them; they know but little beyond their own narrow
sphere; they do not extend their view over the whole surface of the
land, and so perceive and understand the compensating advantages that
wealth and property bestow on the community at large. Sir, with so much
ignorance on one side, and so much oppression on the other, I have
never wondered what perilous errors and bitter hatreds have prevailed;
but I have wondered much, and been very thankful that they have
prevailed so little.'
Lord Ashley concluded by declaring
that it was his object to appeal to, and excite public opinion, 'for
where we cannot legislate,' said he, 'we may exhort; and laws may fail
where example will succeed'.
I must appeal to the Bishops and
Ministers of the Church of England, nay, more, to the Ministers of
every denomination, to urge on the hearts of their hearers, the
mischief and the danger of these covetous and cruel practices; I trust
they will not fall short of the zeal and eloquence of a distinguised
prelate in a neighbouring country, who, in these beautiful and emphatic
words, exhorted his hearers to justice and mercy:- 'Open your eyes,'
said the Prince Archbishop Primate of Normandy, 'and behold: parents
and masters demand of these young plants to produce fruit in the season
of blossoms. By excessive and prolonged labour they exhaust the rising
sap, caring but little that they leave them to vegetate and perish on a
withered and tottering stem. Poor little children! may the laws hasten
to extend their protection over your existence and may
posterity read with astonishment, on the front of this age, so
satisfied with itself, that in these days of progress and discovery
there was needed an iron law to forbid the murder of children by
excessive labour' . . . My grand object is to bring these
children within reach of education. I will say, though
possibly I may be charged with cant and hypocrisy, that I have been
bold enough to undertake this task, because I must regard the objects
of it as beings created, as ourselves, by the same Maker, redeemed by
the same Saviour, and destined to the same immortality; and it is,
therefore, in this spirit, and with these sentiments, that I now
venture to entreat the countenance of this House, and the co-operation
of Her Majesty's Ministers; first to investigate, and ultimately to
remove, these sad evils, which press so deeply and so extensively on
such a large and interesting portion of the human race.
This appeal, distinguished
throughout by an earnest simplicity of language, was answered by the
cordial support of the Government, and the immediate appointment of a
Commission of Inquiry, consisting of a Board of Commissioners, whose
office it was to visit the districts and t report thereon. The field of
inquiry prescribed by the terms of the Commission, comprehended the
mines and collieries of the United Kingdom, and all trades and
manufactures whatever in which children work together in numbers, not
included under the Factories Regulation Act. The mass of evidence sent
up to the Central Board from twenty gentlemen, working day and night,
in different parts f the country, with the utmost energy and without
intermission for many consecutive months, speaks for itself.
Fortunately, the commissioners were men of energy practised in
business. The Chairman, Mr Thomas Tooke, who had held the same
situation in the Factory Commission, possessed the confidence of the
commercial and manufacturing portion of the country. Mr Horner,
_________
From the Wikipedia:
Leonard Horner (January 17, 1785 – March 5, 1864), Scottish
geologist, brother of Francis Horner, was
born in Edinburgh.
Horner was a 'radical educational reformer' who was involved in the
establishment of University College School.
His father, John Horner, was a linen
merchant in Edinburgh, and Leonard, the third and youngest son, entered
the university of Edinburgh in 1799. There in the course of the next
four years he studied chemistry and mineralogy, and gained a love of
geology from Playfairs Illustrations of the ilullonian Theory.
At the age of nineteen he became a partner in a branch of his father's
business, and went to London. In 1808 he joined the newly formed
Geological Society of London
and two years later was elected one of the secretaries. Throughout his
long life he was ardently devoted to the welfare of the society; he was
elected president in 1846 and again in 1860. In 1811 he read his first
paper On the Mineralogy of the Malvern Hills (Trans. Geol.
Soc. vol. i.) and subsequently communicated other papers on the
Brine-springs at Droitwich, and the Geology of the S.W. part of
Somersetshire. He was elected fellow of the Royal Society in 1813.
In 1815 he returned to Edinburgh to take personal superintendence of
his business, and while there (1821)
he was instrumental in founding the Edinburgh School of Arts 101 the
instruction of mechanics, and he was one of the founders of the
Edinburgh Academy. In 1827 he was invited to London to become warden of
the London University, an office which he held for four years; he then
resided at Bonn
for two years and pursued the study of minerals and rocks,
communicating to the Geological Society on his return a paper on the Geology
of
the
Environs
of
Bonn, and another On the Quantity of Solic
Matter suspended in the Water of the Rhine.
In 1833 he was appointed one of the
commissioners to inquire into the employment of children in the
factories of Great Britain,
and he was subsequently selected as one of the inspectors. In
later
years he devoted much attention to the geological history of thi
alluvial lands of Egypt; and in 1843 he published his Life of
his brother Francis. He died in London on the 5th of March 1864. See Memoir
of
Leonard
Horner, by Katherine M Lyell (1890) (privately printed).
He was to have been buried beside his wife in Florence's
'English' Cemetery and the inscription on her tombstone states this,
his own grave space next to hers having been purchased by the family
for this purpose.
__________
and Mr
Saunders, two of the Factory Inspectors, had already spent many years
in pursuing investigations analogous to those which were now to be
made; and Dr. Southwood Smith was qualified as a physiologist and
physician, to appreciate the influence of early labour on the physical
and moral condition of children. But the very extent and completeness
of the evidence transmitted to the Central Board, would have caused its
failure as an instrument of legislation, but for the manner in which it
was decided to deal with it. The subject was divided into two parts,
Mines and Manufactures. The mines were subdivided into collieries and
metallic mines, and the manufactures into the larger branches of
industry, such as metal.wares, earthenware, glass-making, lace-making,
hosiery, calico-printing, paper-making, weaving, &c.
Those who have closely examined the two small volumes, into which
compass are compressed and admirably arranged the main facts contained
in the enormous folios, can alone appreciate the amount of labour
involved in this undertaking, and will not fail to recognize in the
lucid order and condensed style, the hand of Dr. Southwood Smith, on
whom this portion of the labours of the Commission principally
devolved. He did not shrink from the task, though nearly every minute
of the day was absorbed by a fatiguing profession, sustained through
the long hours taken from rest and sleep, by the conviction that the
usefulness of this work would afford a heart-felt compensation for its
labor. The anticipation was fully realized. When the Report on Mines
was laid on the table of the House, astonishment and horror were
universal. No such outrages on humanity had been discovered since the
disclosure of the treatment of Negro slaves. It was truly said that
this Report resembled a volume of travels in a remote and barbarous
country, so little had been previously known of the state of things it
described. Dark passages to seams of coal, scarcely thirty inches in
height, not larger than a good-sized drain, through which children of
both sexes, and of all ages, from seven years old and upwards, toiled
for twelve hours daily, and sometimes more, obliged to crawl on
'all-fours', dragging after them loaded corves or carts, fastened to
their bodies by a belt, a chain passing between the legs; - infants of
four, five, and six years old, carried down on their parents' knees to
keep the air-doors, sitting in a little niche scooped out in the coal,
for twelve hours daily, along, in total darkness, except when the
corves, lighted by their solitary candle, passed along, and some of
them during the winter never seeing the light of day, except on Sunday;
- girls and women hewing coals like men, and by the side of men; -
girls and woman clothed in nothing more than loose trousers, and these
often in rags, working side by side with men in a state of utter
nudity; - girls of tender age carrying on their backs along unrailed
roads, often over their ankles, and sometimes up to their knees in
water, burdens of coal, weighing from 3/4 cwt to 3 cwt, from the bottom
of the mine to the bank, up steep ladders, the height ascended and the
distance along the roads added together, exceeding the height of St
Paul's Cathedral'; married women, and women about to become mothers,
dragging or bearing on their shoulders similar enormous loads, up to
the very moment when forced to leave this 'horse-work' to be 'drawn up'
to give birth to their helpless offspring, - themselves as helpless -
at the pit's-mouth, and sometimes even in the pit itself; - boys of
seven and eight years old, bound, till the age of twenty-one,
apprentices to the colliers, receiving until that age, as the reward
for their labour, nothing but food, clothing, and lodging, working side
by side with young men of their own age, free labourers, the latter
receiving men's wages; - boys employed at the steam-engines for letting
down and drawing up the work-people; - ropes employed for this service
obviously and acknowledgedly unsafe; - accidents of a fearful nature
constantly occurring; - the most ordinary precautions to guard against
danger neglected; a collier's chances of immunity from mortal peril
being about equal to those of a soldier on the field of battle - for
all this neither the legislature nor the public were at all prepared,
nor were they better prepared for the last two conclusions deduced by
the Commissioners, as the result of the whole body of evidence, namely:
-
That partly by the severity of the
labour and the long hours of work, and partly through the unhealthy
state of the place of work, this employment, as at present carried on
in all the districts, deteriorates the physical constitution; in the
thin-seam mines, more especially, the limbs become crippled and the
body distorted; and in general the muscular powers give way, and the
work-people are incapable of following their occupation, at an earlier
period of life than is common in other branches of industry. - That by
the same causes, the seeds of painful and mortal disease are often sown
in childhood and youth; these, slowly but steadily developing
themselves, assume a formidable character between the ages of thirty
and forty; and each generation of this class of the ppulation is
commonly extinct soon after fifty.
When on June 7, 1842, Lord Ashley moved for leave to bring in a Bill,
founded on this Report, there was an unusually large attendance of
members. After expressing his warm acknowledgements to the late
Administration, 'not only for the Commission which they gave, but for
the Commissioners whom they appointed, gentlemen who had performed the
duties assigned them with unrivalled skill, fidelity and zeal,' he
proceeded in an elaborate speech, listened to throughout by a silent
and deeply attentive House, to detail the most important points of the
physical miseries and the moral deterioration of large classes of the
community, that the motion was granted without a dissentient voice.
Members on every side vied with each other in cordial assent and
sympathy with the measure. The contemporary press echoed the tone; the
manner of the speech was deservedly eulogized for its freedom from all
sickly sentimentalities, useless recriminations, and philanthropic
clap-traps; for the way in which the startling and impressive facts of
the case were simply stated and lucidly arranged, and in which each was
made to bear upon the nature and necessity of the projected remedy,
while blessings were invoked in the name of humanity, on the man by
whom this was done and done so well. 'The laurels of party', it was
truly declared, 'were worthless, compared with the wreath due to this
generous enterprise.'
Lord Ashley's Bill proposed a total exclusion of girls and women from
the labour of mines and collieries; a total prohibition of male
children from this labour, no boy being allowed to descend into a mine,
for the purpose of performing any kind of work therein, under thirteen
years of age; a total prohibition of apprenticeship to this labour, and
a provision that no person, other than a man between twenty-one and
fifty years of age, shall have charge of the machinery by which the
work-people are let down and drawn up the shafts.
The history of the mutilated progress of this Bill through both Houses,
has now to be recorded.
The first point was unanimously acceded to in the Commons; the second
was altered by the substitution of the age of ten, for that of
thirteen; the concession, however, being neutralized as far as was
practicable, by the provision, that no boy under thirteen should work
on any two successive days; the third was materially altered by the
addition of the word 'underground', thus allowing the collier to take
apprentices provided he worked them on the surface; the fourth was
altered by omitting the limitation to fifty, thus permitting the lives
of all who work in mines, to be placed in the hands of aged and
decrepit men.
Thus changed, each change, it will be observed, being directly against
the interest and safety of the work-people, the Bill passed the
Commons. In the House of Lords, the whole measure was met with a spirit
of hostility as unexpected as it was unanimous, and alas! successful.
It had been forgotten that the mines and collieries of the kingdom
belong, with very few exceptions, to the great landed proprietors - the
same noble lords who had now to decide on the fate of the Bill. For
some
time it was impossible to get any member of that noble House to take
any charge of the business. At length, Lord Devon, from a feeling of
shame to which so many had showed themselves insensible, volunteered to
do what he could to conduct the Bill through its perilous course. In
this noble House, even the prohibition to work female children, and
married women, and women about to become mothers, was murmured at, but
no member ventured to propose an alteration of this part of the
measure. the clause prohibiting apprentceship was expunged, saving that
a provision was retained that no apprenticeship should be contracted
under ten years of age, nor for a longer period than eight years. The
clause limiting the labour of boys under thirteen to alternate days,
was expunged. And the clause regulating the age of the persons that
work the machinery for conveying the work-people up and down the
shafts, which the Commons had altered on the one hand so as to permit
decrepit men to perform this office, the Lords now altered on the
other, so as to entrust it to boys.
Early in the following Session, the commissioners presented their
second Report on Trades and Manufactuers, drawn up on the same
elaborate plan, written with the same clearness and calmness, and
exhibiting in some respects a still more melancholy, though not so
startling a picture of the condition of large classes of our industrial
population. It discloses in its full extent the mischief done to the
former Bill by the expulsion of the clause prohibiting apprenticeship;
for it proves that the oppressions and cruelties perpetrated under this
legal sanction in mines and collieries, is even exceeded in some trades
and manufactures. The words of the Report relative to this subject,
ought to sink deep into the mind and heart of the country. After
stating
that in some trades, more especially those requiring skilled workmen,
apprentices are bound by legal indentures usually at the age of
fourteen, and for a term of seven years, the Commissioners continue: -
But by far the greater number are
bound without any prescribed legal forms, and in almost all these cases
they are required to serve their
masters, at whatever age they may commence their apprenticisehip, until
they attain the age of twenty-one, in some instances in
employments in which there is nothing
deserving the name of skill to be acquired, and in other
instances in employments in which they are taught to make only one particular part of
the article manufactured; so that at the end of their servitude they
are altogether unable to make any one article of their trade in a
complete state. A large proportion of these apprentices consist
of orphans, or are the children of widows, or belong to the poorest
families, and frequently are appenticed by Boards of Guardians. The
term of servitude of these apprentices may and sometimes does commence
as early as seven years of age, and is often passed under circumstances
of great hardship and ill-usage, and under the condition
that, during the greater part, if not the whole, of their term, they
receive nothing for their labour beyond food and clothing. This system
of apprenticeship is most prevalent in the districts around
Wolverhampton, and is most abused by what are called 'small masters',
persons who are either themselves journeymen, or who, if working on
their own account, work with their apprentices. In these districts it
is the practice among some of the employers to engage the services of
children by a simple written agreement, on the breach of which the
defaulter is liable to be committed to jail, and in fact often is so
without regard to age.
The Report on Wolverhampton states, that 'within the last four
years five hundred and eight-four males and females, all under age,
have been committed to Stafford jail for breach of contract'. The
following passage concerning the treatment of the children, completes
the picture: -
In the cases in which the children
are the servants of the workmen, and under their sole control, the
master apparently knowing nothing about their treatment, and certainly
taking no charge of it, they are almost always roughly, very often
harshly, and sometimes cruelly used; and in the districts around
Wolverhampton in particular, the treatment of them is oppressive and
brutal to the last degree.
Wolverhampton, it will be remembered, is the centre of the iron
manufactures in South Staffordshire, and the words of this Report in
their simple conciseness, lay bare a state of things, which, that it
should exists at this day,
just as if no Commission had been established, and no facts made known
to the public, in the centre of a country which calls itself civilized,
is an outrage to humanity. The descriptions of this district exhibit
scenes of actual misery among the children, far surpassing the
inventions of fiction. Here, in the busy workshops, the
Assistant-Commissioner saw the poor apprentice boys at their daily
labour; their anxious faces, looking three times their age, on deformed
and stunted bodies, showing no trace of the beauty and gladness of
childhood or youth: their thin hands and long fingers toiling at the
vice for twelve, fourteen, sixteen, sometimes more hours out of the
twenty-four; yet with all their toil, clothed in rags, shivering with
cold, half-starved or fed on offal, beaten, kicked, abused, struck with
locks, bars, hammers, or other heavy tools, burnt with showers of
sparks from red-hot irons, pulled by the hair and ears till be the
blood ran down, and in vain imploring for mercy; - and all this is
going on now.
Why should it go on? Apprenticeship is not an order of Nature. It is an
arrangement, good in itself, made by the law, and the law should
therefore regulate it beneficently. The necessity of interfering
between parents and children has been admitted, and in some degree
acted upon in the factories, mines, and collieries. It is equally
necessary in trades and manufactures; and much more is it necessary to
interfere between masters and apprentices. The natural instinct has
even still some power. The mothers do carry their over-toiled children
to their beds when they are too tired to crawl to them, - but no one
cares for the wretched apprentice. He may lie down and die when his
'long day's work' is done, and his master can get another, and a
sovereign besides, at the workhouse.
It is difficult to make an abridgement of the concise and graphic
descriptions given in these Reports of the physical and moral condition
of the persons employed in the various branches of industry included in
the inquiry; and it is the less necessary, because the means of
information are placed within the reach of all; an octavor volume*
having been published by direction of the
_____________
* 'Physical and Moral Conditions of the Children and Young Persons
employed in Mines and Manufactures. Illustrated by extracts from the
Reports of the Commissioners' - London: Published for her Majesty's
Stationery Office, by J.W. Parker, West Strand. 1843.
_____________
Government, at the desire of the House of Commons, containing
verbatim the most important portions of the Reports. The individuals
composing these classes are to be numbered not by thousands, but by
millions; yet what is the weighed, the solemn verdict given by this
Commission as to their moral condition? Every word has been deeply
considered - and should so be read. The Commissioners say, in their
general conclusion: -
That the parents, urged by poverty
or improvidence, generally seek employment for the children as soon as
they can earn the lowest amount of wages; paying but little regard to
the probable injury of their children's health by early labour, and
still less regard to the certain injury of their minds by early removal
from school, or even by the total neglect of their education; seldom,
when questioned expressing any desire for the regulation of the hours
of work, with a view to the protection and welfare of their children,
but constantly expressing the greatest apprehension lest any
legislative restriction should deprive them of the profits of their
children's labour; the natural parental instinct to provide, during
childhood, for the child's subsistence, being, in great numbers of
instances, wholly extinguished, and the order of nature even reversed -
the children supporting, instead of being supported by, their parents.
That the means of instruction are so grievously defective that in all
the districts great numbers of children are growing up without any
religious, moral, or intellectual training; nothing being done to train
them to habits of order, sobriety, honesty, and forethought, or even to
restrain them from vice and crime.
That there is not a single district in which the means of instruction
are adequate to the wants of the people, while in some it is
insufficient for the education of one third of the population. That as
a natural consequence of this neglect, and of the possession of
unrestrained liberty at an early age, when few are capable of
self-government, great numbers of these children and young persons
acquire in childhood and youth habits which utterly destroy their
future health, usefulness, and happiness.
The details forming the basis of
these general statements, - which are cold abstractions, necessarily
incapable of presenting the living action and passion of the countless
individuals from whom they are derived, - exhibit a degree of
widespread ignorance, vice, and suffering,
for the
disclosure of which the country was wholly unprepared. For this
national moral evil there is no remedy but a national education; and
the prsentation of the Report was followed, on the part of Lord Ashley,
by a motion for 'A Moral and Religious Education of the Working
Classes'. He sustained his motion by a speech, in which, after
expressing his heartfelt thanks to the Commissioners for 'an exercise
of talent and vigour never surpassed by any public servants', he gave a
comprehensive, massive, and most impressive summary of the results of
their labours. Few who were in the House on that night will ever forget
the effect produced when, urging on his audience to consider the rapid
progress of time, and the appalling rapidity with which a child of nine
years of age, abandoned to himself, and to companions like himself, is
added to the ranks of viciousness, misery, and disorder in manhod, he
turned from the Speaker, and looking round on those of his own order,
exclaimed - 'You call these poor people improvident and immoral, and so
they are; but that improvidence and immorality are the results of our
neglect, and, in some measure, of our example. Declare this night that
you will enter on a novel and a better course - that you will seek
their temporal through their eternal welfare - and the blessing of God
will rest upon your endeavours; and, perhaps, the oldest among you may
live to enjoy for himself and for his children the opening day of the
immortal, because the moral glories of the British Empire.'
This appeal was met on the part of the Secretary of State for the Home
Deparment, Sir James Graham, by the answer that he had matured a plan
which might be regarded as the first effort of Government to introduce
a national system of education. There were unquestionably elements of
good in the education clauses, particularly as they were altered in the
course of debate, and they might have formed the basis of institutions
expanding and improving by experience, until they were put in harmony
with the feelings, and became adequate to the wants of the people; but,
unfortunately, whatever may have been the real intentions of the
Minister, the announcement of his plan had the effect of exciting in a
violent degree the sectarian animosities of the people; and after
having arrayed from one end of the kingdom to another in desperate
conflict Churchman against Dissenter, and Dissenter against Churchman,
and different sections of each against all the rest, terminated, not
only in the loss of any measure for education, but in the defeat of the
amendment of the Factory Act, to which the Minister had attached his
scheme of National Education. Consequently, the evils resulting from
ignorance, remain as before. The Factory Act will, however, be amended.
Government announced on February 6, the intention of limiting the
labour of children, under thirteen, to six hours daily.
But although the opportunity of making a nationl provision for
education has for the present been lost, yet the exposure of the total
inadequacy of existing institutions for the intellectual and moral
training of the people, has not been without a useful result. Within
the space of a few months after the publication of the Reports of the
'Children's Employment Commission', and immediately after the failure
of the Government plan of education, the friends of the Established
Church raised in voluntary contributions an educational fund amounting
to nerly £200,000; and one denomination of Dissenters (the
Independents) at their first meeting, subscribed towards a similar fund
upwards of £17,000, and pledged themselves to use their utmost
exertions to increse this sum to £100,000 in the space of five
years. The Methodists also have pledged themselves to raise
£200,000 in seven years, and found 700 schools; other bodies of
Dissenters have followed in the same track; so that the people have
already put to shame the 'National Grant of £30,000', the utmost
amount ever yet voted by Parliament for the education of the country -
a sum scarcely sufficient to defray the expense of one convict ship, or
to maintain for a year one single prison!
The two commissions on which Dr Southwood Smith has been engaged, have
unavoidably turned his mind away from the speculative studies which at
one period occupied him more exclusively, and have converted him from a
thinker into a worker. Circumstances connected with his profession had
long forced upon his observation the wretched state of the dwellings of
the poor, and this disease, suffering, and death produced by the
noxious exhalations that arise from the unsewered, undrained, and
uncleansed localities into which their houses are crowded. 'Nature',
said he, 'with her burning sun, her stilled and pent-up wind, her
stagnant and teeming marsh, manufactures plague on a large and fearful
scale: poverty in her hut, covered with her rags, surrounded with her
filth, striving with all her might to keep out the pure air, and to
increase the heat, imitates nature but too successfully; the the
process and the product are the same, the only difference is in the
magnitude of the result'. In the year 1837, this result was produced in
certain of the metropolitan districts to such an unusual extent as to
attract the attention of the Poor Law commissioners. They requested Drs
Southwood Smith, Arnott and Kay to investigate the cause. The districts
assigned to Dr Smith were Whitechapel and Bethnal Green, and he adopted
the plan of writing a ltieral description of what he saw in his tour
over these unknown regions. Of the many pictures of squalid
wretchedness presented, the following may serve as specimens: -
An open area of about 700 feet in
length, and 300 in breadth; 300 feet of which are covered by stagnant
water, winter and summer. In the part thus submerged, there is always a
quantity of putrefying animal and vegetable matter, the odour of which
at the present moment is most offensive. An open filthy ditch encircles
this place. Into this ditch all the . . . Nothing can be conceived more
disgusting than the appearance; and the odour of the effluvia is at
this moment most offensive. Lamb's-fields is the fruitful source of
fever to the houses which immediately surround it, and to the
small streets which branch off from it. Particular houses were pointed
out to me from which entire families have been swept away, and from
several of the streets fever is never absent.
Of St John Street, a close and densely populated place, in which
malignant fever has prevailed in almost every house, he says: -
In one room which I examined,
eight feet by ten and nine feet high, six people live by day and sleep
at night; the closeness and stench are almost intolerable. . . . Alfred
and Beckwith Rows consist of small buildings divided into two houses,
one back, the other front: each house bieng divided into two tenements,
occupied by different families. these habitations are surrounded by a
broad open drain, in a filthy condition. Heaps of filth are accumulated
in the spaces meant for gardens in front of the houses. . . . I entered
several of the tenements. In one of them, on the ground floor, I found
six persons occupying a very small room, two in bed, ill with fever. In
this same room a woman was carrying on the process of silk-winding . .
. . Campden-gardens: the dwellings are small ground-floor houses, each
containing two rooms, the largest about seven feet by nine, the
smallest barely large enough to admit a small bed; the height about
seven feet; in winter these houses are exceedingly damp; the windows
are very small; there is no drainage of any kind; it is close upon a
marshy district. Often all the members of a family are attacked by
fever, and die one after the other.
These descriptions can only be compared to Howard's account of the
'State of Prisons', fifty years ago. The jail fever was then a
recognized and prevalent disease; it is now only a subject of history.
So may the typhus fever of London be fifty years hence. It requires
only an enlightened legislature to order, and efficient officers to
enforce known remedies.
The impression produced by the entire Report, portions of which have
now been extracted, led to the motion made by the Bishop of London, in
the Session of 1839, for an extension of the inquiry into the state of
other towns in the United Kingdom. Early in the following Session
(1840), Mr Slaney obtained a Select Committee of the House of Commons
for inquiring into the 'Health of Towns'. Dr Southwood Smith was the
first witness examined before this Committee, who largely quote his
'valuable evidence' in their Report, and refer the legislatiure to the
important paper which he furnished to them, entitled 'Abstract of a
Report on the prevalence of Fever in Twenty Metropolitan Unions during
the year 1838', which they reprinted in their Appendix.
The urgency of the case had now attracted the notice of Government, and
in particular had impressed the noble Secretary of State for the Home
Department, the Marquis of Normanby;
____________________
From the Wikipedia:
Constantine Henry Phipps, 1st Marquess of Normanby KG GCB GCH
(May 15, 1797 – July 28, 1863) was a politician and author of the
United Kingdom. He was the son of Henry Phipps, 1st Earl of Mulgrave
(1755–1831) and great-grandson of Sir Constantine Henry Phipps
(1656–1723). He studied at Harrow and Trinity College, Cambridge, where
he was the second President of the Cambridge Union Society, then sat
for the family borough of Scarborough when he attained his majority.
However after dissenting from the family politics, such as by speaking
in favour of Catholic emancipation, he resigned his seat and lived in
Italy for two years. On his return in 1822 he was elected for Higham
Ferrers and made a considerable reputation by political pamphlets and
by his speeches in the house. He was returned for Malton at the general
election of 1826, becoming a supporter of Canning. He was already known
as a writer of romantic tales, The English in Italy (1825); in
the same year he made his appearance as a novelist with Matilda,
and
in
1828
he
produced another novel, Yes and No. He succeeded
his father as earl of Mulgrave in 1831. He was sent out as Governor of
Jamaica and was afterwards appointed Lord Lieutenant of Ireland
(1835–1839).
He was created the first marquess of Normanby on June 25, 1838, and
held successively the offices of colonial secretary and home secretary
in the last years of Lord Melbourne’s ministry. While Colonial
Secretary, he wrote a letter of instructions to William Hobson, in
which the government's policy for the sovereignty of New Zealand was
set out. From 1846 to 1852 he was ambassador at Paris, to and from 1854-1858 minister at Florence.
The
publication
in
1857
of a journal kept in Paris during the stormy
times of 1848 (A Year of Revolution), brought him into violent
controversy with Louis Blanc, and he came into conflict with Lord
Palmerston and Mr Gladstone, after his retirement from the public
service, on questions of French and Italian policy. He died in London
on July 28, 1863. He had married in 1818 the daughter of Thomas Henry
Liddell, 1st Baron Ravensworth, and was succeeded as marquess by his
son George.
Thus he knew the Brownings, who were in Florence
from 1846-1861. While Southwood Smith, visiting his daugher Emily,
Mazzini's friend, in Florence in 1856, would likely have renewed his
friendship with Normanby.
____________
but like many others, being unable to dismiss a doubt whether
there were not some exaggerations in these descriptions, he resolved to
verify their correctness by a personal inspection of the districts in
question. He accordingly accompanied Dr Southwood Smith in a visit to
Whitechapel and Bethnal Green, and was so deeply affected by what he
saw, that he declared his instant conviction, that 'so far from any
exaggeration having crept into the descriptions which had been given,
they had not conveyed to his mind an adequate idea of the truth'; as
indeed no words can do. Lord Ashley afterwards performed the same
painful round in company with Dr Smith, and expressed himself in a
similar manner.*
___________
*These statements are strictly authentic. They went privately, and
unattended, into the most squalid and hideous abodes of filth, and
misery, and vice, and might well express themselves strongly in public
after what they witnessed. H.
___________
In the Session of 1841, Lord Normanby introduced into Parliament his
Bill for the 'Drainage of Buildings'; and in his speech on moving the
second reading of the Bill on February 12, he acknowledged the services
of Dr. Southwood Smith, in the following terms. 'I cannot allude to
them', he said, 'without at once expressing my obligations to that
indefatigably benevolent gentleman for much useful information which I
have derived from him, with whom I have had the satisfaction of much
personal communication on this subject'. The principal provisions of
this Bill regarded the drainage of houses, the regulation of the width
of lanes and alleys, and the form and conveniences of dwellings. The
bishop of London warmly supported the measure: - 'As presiding over the
spiritual interests of the metropolis, he felt deeply interested in a
Bill which he was satisfied would so materially affect them: and being
thoroughly convinced that the physical condition of the poor was
intimately connected with their moral and religious state, and the two
exerted a mutual influence upon each other, he thankfully hailed the
present measure as the first step towards an elevation of that class of
the community in the scale of social comfort and order'. Lord
Ellenborough followed in the same spirit: - 'It is idle,' said he, 'to
build churches, to erect school-houses, and to employ clergymen and
schoolmasters, if we do no more. Our first object should be to improve
the physical condition of the poor labourer, - to place him in a
position in which he can acquire self-respect; above all things to give
him a home'.
But before this measure had passed, there was a dissolution of
Parliament, and a change in the administration. The present ministers
have appointed a Commission of Inquiry into the state of large towns
and populous districts, with a view, chiefly, to report on remedies;
which remedies, however, notwithstanding the urgency of the case are
still delayed. In an extended examination before these Commissioners Dr
Southwood Smith states that the disease formerly described by him,
still continues, and with increasing virulence; that a new epidemic is
now ravaging the metropolis, far more extensive and fatal than the
preceding; that the poorer classes in their neglected districts, are
still exposed to causes of disease, suffering, and death which are
peculiar to them, and the malignant influence of which is steady,
unceasing, and sure. His words are too terrible to need any comment: -
'The result', he says, 'is the
same as if twenty or thirty thousand of these people were annually
taken out of their wretched dwellings and put to death, the actual fact
being that they are allowed to remain in them and die. I am now
speaking of what silently, but surely, takes place every year in the
metropolis alone, and do not include in this estimate the numbers that
perish from these causes in the other great cities, and in the towns
and villages of the kingdom. It has been stated that "the annual
slaughter in England and Wales, from preventible causes, of typhus
fever, which attacks persons in the vigour of life, is double the
amount of what was suffered by the allied armies in the battle of
Waterloo". This is no exaggerated statement: this great battle against
our people is every year fought and won; and yet few take account of
it, partly for the very reason that it takes place every year. However
appalling the picture presented to the mind by this statement, it may
be justly regarded as a literal expression of the truth. I am myself
convinced from what I constantly see of the ravages of this disease,
that this mode of putting the result does not give an exaggerated
expression of it. Indeed the most appalling expression of it would be
the mere cold statement of it in figures'.
In conclusion, Dr Smith enforced
in earnest language, the consideration that this whole class of evils
is remediable; that it does not belong to that description of evil
which is mingled with good in the conditions of our being, but to that
much larger sum of suffering, which is the consequence of our own
ignorance and apathy; -
'No government', said he, 'can
prevent the existence of poverty; no benevolence can reach the evils of
extreme poverty; under the circumstances which at present universally
accompany it; but there is ground of hope and encouragement in the
thought that the most painful and debasing of those circumstances are
adventitious, and form no necessary and inevitable
part of the condition of that large class of every community which must
earn their daily bread by their manual labour. These adventitious
circumstances constitute the hardest part of the lot of the poor, and
these, as I have just said, are capable of being prevented to a very
large extent. The labours of a single individual, I mean those of the
illustrious Howard, have at length succeeded in removing exactly
similar evils, though somewhat more concentrated and intense, from our
prisons; they are at least equally capable of being removed from the
dwelling houses and workplaces of the people. Here there is a field of
beneficient labour which falls legitimately within the scope of the
legislator, and which is equally within that of the philanthropist,
affording a common ground beyond the arena of party strife, in the
culture of which all parties may united with the absolute certainty
that they cannot thus labour without producing some god result, and
that the good produced, whatever may be its amount, must be unmixed
good.'
Dr Smith is now engaged with Lord Ashley and other influential and
benevolent men, in the formation of an Association for improving the
dwellings of the industrious classes, by the erection of comfortable,
cleanly, well-drained and ventilated houses, to be let to families in
sets of rooms, with an ample supply of water on each floor; a fair
return for the capital invested being secured. Eleemosynary relief
forms no part of the undertaking, as tending to destroy the
independence of those whom it is designed to benefit. The association
has fully matured its plans, and will endeavour practically to show by
model-houses what may be done by combination to lessen the
expensiveness of the dwellings of the poor, and to increase their
healthfulness and comforts.
Though the sanatary conditions of the working classes has been the
especial object of Dr Southwood Smith of late years, he has not
forgotten the wants of the middle classes in the season of sickness.
These are not at first sight so obvious; but there are circumstances
which have never been sufficiently considered, that place many, whose
station in life removes them above the evils of poverty, in a worse
condition when overtaken by disease than the poor who can obtain
admission into the hospitals. Numbers of the middle classes annually
leave their homes and families and flock to London, as to a common
centre, to find employment, or to complete their education. Others
resort to it from distant parts of the country for medical or surgical
advice. Strangers and foreigners constantly visit it. When attacked by
disease - a close and comfortless lodging in a noisy street, with no
better attendance than the already overtasked servant of all work, or a
landlady, who begins to dread infection, or the non-payment of her
rent, - is the lot of many a delicately minded and sensitive person in
the pain of fever or inflammation, with all the desolation of the
feeling of absence from home and friends.
Out of a sympathy with such sufferers, arose in Dr Smith's mind the
idea of founding an institution on the principles of the great clubs,
arranged with every requisite for a place of abode in sickness, and
provided with regular medical officers and nurses; the principle of
admission being, as in the case of the clubs, a certain yearly
subscription, and a fixed weekly payment during residence in it. Such
institutions are not uncommon on the continent, though, until the
present time, none have existed in this country. That originated by Dr
Southwood Smith, under the name of the 'Sanatorium', was opened in
March, 1842, at Devonshire Place House in the New Road. the house is
well calculated for an experimental attempt, but is not sufficiently
large to carry out the purposes which he contemplated. These would
extend to suites of rooms, kept at a regular temperature for
consumptive cases, and to a separate building for fever cases, which
are now totally excluded. It appears only to want greater publicity to
attain its full scope of usefulness; but unless supported by the class
for whom it is designed it cannot be maintained at all. that such a
club is certain to be well supported at some period not far distance,
we can plainly see; but the attempt may be premature. Its founder -
deriving no personal advantage from the design, but devoting much time
and labour to its advancement - has rested its claim to public support
simply on the ground, that, as when the middle and higher classes
combine to found public schools and colleges, and to build and endow
churches, they solicit the contributions of the rich and benevolent
because no new thing, however excellent in itself, or however affluent
in the means of securing its ultimate independence and prosperity, can
be set on foot without some capital; so this institution appeals to the
public for assistance, to enable it to mitigate suffering, to shorten
the duration of disease, and to save life. The Bank of England, and the
large and influential merchants' houses have seen the good of the
undertking, and have contributed largely to promote it; nor should we
omit to notice in particular the strenuous exertions of Mr Thomas
Chapman, the Chairman of the Sanatorium Committee.
Amidst his many arduous and apparently endless labours, some words of
encouragement should be addressed to Dr Southwood smith, who in his
private station devotes himself to the diffusion of philosophical
truth, and to the instruction of the people in some of the most
practically interesting and least understood parts of knowledge. He has
described for them the wonderful structures that form the outward and
visible machinery of life, and the still more wonderful results of its
action - the processes that constitute the vital functions. He has
shown the brighter portion of the height and depth of our human nature
in the Sources of Happiness, and has proved that 'in the entire range
of the sentient creation, without a single exception, the higher the
organized structure, the greater the enjoyment to which it ministers
and in which it terminates'. He has so expounded the philosophy of
Pain, as to communicate to the mourning and desponding, heart and hope,
and has taught in the noblest sense the uses of adversity. He has still
to deduce from the action of physical agents on living structures the
laws of health, and to expound the intellectual and moral constitution
based on the physical and growing out of it; without a knowledge of
which, neither the mother nor the educator can avoid the most
pernicious errors, nor ultimately reach their goal. There are minds and
hearts that thank him for what he has already accomplished, and that
anxiously await the completion of his work.
By his public labours Dr Smith has awakened the attention of the people
at large, and of the legislature, to those physical causes of
suffering, disease, and premature death, which, while they afflict the
whole community, press with peculiar severity on the poorer classes;
and has shown not only that these causes are removable, but the means
by which human wisdom and energy may certainly succeed in removing them
And he is peculiarly fitted to render services to the community on this
important subject, in consequence of his intimate acquaintnce with that
dreadful train of diseases which are entailed on humanity by our
inattention to removing the causes of the febrile poison.
Lord Ashley is yet young, and few men have before them a more noble, or
more successul career. He has proved that he possesses the qualities
requisite for the performance of the mission to which he has felt the
vocation. He is not only intellectual, but possessed of the greatest
industry, perseverance, and confidence in his cause, yet diffident of
himself from the very depth of his feeling concerning it; not wanting
in firmness, yet candid and conciliating, and though earnest even to
enthusiasm, tempering and directing the impulses of zeal by a sober and
sound judgement. His singleness of purpose, his unquestioned sincerity
and honesty, his diligence in collecting facts, his careful sifting,
lucid arrangement, and concise and candid exposiiton of them, and his
plain unaffected language and unpretending address, have secured him
the deeply respectful attention even of the House of Commons. Sustained
in his appeals to that difficult assembly by the profound consciousness
that the cause he advocates must engage on its side the sympathies of
our
common humanity, on which he throws himself with a generous confidence,
he often produces the highest results of eloquence. He has already
calmed the fears of the capitalists; conciliated the Government;
engaged the co-operation of the Legislature; placed under the
protection
of the Law the children of the factories; placed under the protection
of the Law the still more helpless children doomed to the mines and
collieries; and to the female children and women, heretofore confined
therein, he has said - 'You are free, and shall do the work of beasts
in the attitude of beasts, no more'. Lord Ashley has still to
emancipate apprentices; to obtain a general registration of accidents;
to improve the localities and dwellings of the poor; and to give the
compensating benefit of education to those whose early years are spent
in labour. Because the first attempts to accomplish these great objects
have failed, let no evasions, obstacles, delays, discourage him, not
let him -
Bate
a
jot,
-
Of heart or hope; but still bear up and steer
Right onward.
'Hengist' Horne, editor of the New
Spirit
of
the
Age, also worked on this Royal Commission on the
Employment
of Children in Mines and Factories, 1841-1843, and Elizabeth Barrett
Barrett wrote her moving 'The Cry of the Children', read out in the
House of Lords, eventually incorporating the findings in her character
of Marian Erle in Aurora Leigh,
while
Fanny
Trollope
saw
conditions in England for
English children as demonstrably worse than for slaves on American
plantations. Requested
by
Lord
Ashley
to
write
in support of his work for children in factories and mines, she
published The Life and Adventures of
Michael
Armstrong, Factory Boy, in 1840. She and Hervieu actually
travelled to the
milltowns and she and he together witnessed the most terrible scene in
the book, where the starving children working in the mill steal from
the pigs their swill.


Leigh Hunt's epitaph on Thomas Southwood Smith's
tomb
speaks of his work in hygiene for the poor, his stress upon the
relationship of fever with poverty.
Ages
shall
honor,
in
their
hearts
enshrined,
thee,
SOUTHWOOD SMITH, Physician of
Mankind
Bringer
of Air, Light, Health into the home
Of the rich Poor of happier years
to come.
It would be discovered in 1909 that typhus, also called
'Jail Fever', 'Hospital Fever', 'Ship Fever' and 'Famine Fever',
is caused by body lice or by rat fleas. Though not discovering this
specific aspect of the disease, the work of Howard in the prisons and
Southwood Smith in the slums in their advocacy of hygiene were correct.
Scottish Unitarian Margaret Gillies has portraits of
Leigh
Hunt,
Hengist
Horne,
William
Wordsworth, Mary Howitt and Southwood
Smith (NPG
D8396), with whom she lived, in
the
National
Portrait
Gallery.
Likewise
there
is a portrait bust by Joel T. Hart on Southwood Smith's
tomb, below, while the National Portrait Galley has another by that
American sculptor (NPG
339).
*§ THOMAS
SOUTHWOOD SMITH (1788-1861)/ ENGLAND/Southwood
Smith/ M.D./ Tommaso/ Inghilterra/ Firenze/
10 Dicembre/ 1861/ Anni 73/ 761/ Southwood Smith,
l'Angleterre/ Southwood Smith's granddaughter, Octavia Hill,
continued
his work, introducing housing reform in slums]/ GL23777/1 N° 301,
Rev
O'Neill/ In Memory of SOUTHWOOD SMITH, Physician/ who through the
promotion
of sanitary/ reform in the principles of which he was the first to
discover
and through other philanthropic and literary labour was distinguished
as
a Benefactor of Mankind/ Born at Martock, Somersetshire/ Dec 21, 1788,
Died at Florence/ Dec 10, 1861// + THEN SHALL THE RIGHTEOUS SHINE FORTH
AS THE SUN IN THE KINGDOM/ OF THEIR FATHER/ MATTHEW XII v.43//
[Below
Joel T. Hart's sculpted portrait medallion] / Ages shall honor, in
their
hearts enshrined, thee, SOUTHWOOD SMITH, Physician of Mankind/ Bringer
of Air, Light, Health into the home/ Of the rich Poor of happier years
to come/ Leigh Hunt/ D20I/ Sculptor: Joel Tanner
Hart: Signature on neck of bust:
J.T.HART
aa
WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR
WEBSITE: Recordings of Gebir I, Gebir II || Essay 'Walter Savage Landor' in New Spirit of the Age ||
Jean Field, 'Walter Savage Landor's Warwick'
|| 'Black and Red Letter Chaucer' || Kate
Field,
Atlantic Montly, 'The Last Days of Walter Savage Landor' ||
Mark Roberts, 'The Inscription on the
Grave of Walter Savage Landor' ||
Alison Levy, 'The Widow of Walter Savage
Landor' ||
Kristin Bragadottir, 'William Morris
and Daniel Willard Fiske' (Villa Landor) ||
Piero Fusi, 'A. Henry Savage Landor'.
WALTER
SAVAGE
LANDOR
(NPG
2127)
Let
his
page,
Which charms the chosen Spirits of the Age,
Fold itself up for a serener clime
Of years to come, and find its recompense
In that just expectation.
Shelley
alter Landor, when a Rugby boy,
was famous, among other feats of
strength and skill, for the wonderful precision with which he used a
cast-net; and he was not often disposed to ask permission of the owners
of thos ponds or streams that suited his morning's fancy. One day a
farmer suddenly came down upon him; and ordered him to desist, and give
up his net. Whereupon Landor instantly cast his net over the farmer's
head; caught him; entangled him; overthrew him; and when he was
exhausted, addressed the enraged and discomfited face beneath the
meshes, till the farmer promised to behave discreetly. The pride that
resented a show of intimidation, the prudence that instantly foresaw
the only means of superseding punishment, and the promptitude of will
and action, are sufficiently conspicuous. The wilful energy and
self-dependent force of character displayed by Walter Landor as a boy,
and accompanied by physical power and activity, all of which were
continued through manhood, and probably have been so, to a great
extent, even up to the present time, have exerted an influence upon his
genius of a very peculiar kind: - a genius healthy, but the
healthfulness not always well applied - resolute, in a lionlike sense,
but not intellectually concentrated and continuous: and seeming to be
capable of mastering all things except its own wilful impulses.
Mr Landor is a man of genius and learning, who stands in a
position
unlike that of any other eminent individual of his time. He has
received no apparent influence from any one of his contemporaries; nor
have they or the public received any apparent influence from him. The
absence of any fixed and definite influence upon the public is actually
as it seems; but that he has exercised a considerable influence upon
the minds of many of his contemporaries is inevitable, because so fine
a spirit could never have passed through any competent medium without
communicating its electric forces, although from the very fineness of
its elements, the effect, like the cause, has been of too subtle a
nature to leave a tangible or visible impress.
To all these causes combined is attributable the singular fact,
that
although Walter Savage Landor has been before the public as an author
during the last fifty years, his genius seldom denied, but long since
generally recognized, and his present position admissibly in that of
the highest rank of authors - and no man higher - there has never been
any philosophical and critical estimate of his powers. Admired he has
often been abundantly, but the admiration has only been supported by
'extract', or by an off-hand opinion. The present paper does not
pretend to supply this great deficiency in our critical literature; it
will attempt to do no more than 'open up' the discussion.
Walter Landor, when at Rugby school, was a leader in all things,
yet
who did not associate with his schoolfellows - the infallible sign of a
strong and original character and course through life. He was
conspicuous there for his resistance to every species of tyranny,
either of the masters and their rules, or the boys and their system of
making fags, which things he resolutely opposed 'against all odds'; and
he was, at the same time, considered arrogant and overbearing in his
own conduct. He was almost equally famous for riding out of bounds,
boxing, leaping, net-casting, stone-throwing, and for making Greek and
Latin verses. Many of these verses were repeated at Rugby forty years
after he had left the school. The 'master', however, studiously
slighted him so long, that when at last the token was given of
appreciation of certain Latin verses, the indignant young classic being
obliged to copy them out fairly in the 'play-book', added a few more,
commencing with, -
Haec sunt malorum pessima carminum
Quot Landor unquam scripsit; at accipe
Quae Tarquini servas cloacam,
Unde tuum, dea flava nomen, &
From Rugby to Trinity College, Oxford, was the next remove of
Walter Savage Landor. He was 'rusticated' for firing off a gun in the
quadrangle; but as he never intended to take a degree, he did not
return. He left Oxford - let all the juvenile entities who have taken
up facile pens of judgement about Mr Landor during the last ten years,
tremble as they read, and 'doubt their own abilities' - in the summer
of 1793, when he put forth a small volume of poems. They were published
by Cadell, and it will not be thought very surprising that the first
poems of a young man, at that time quite unknown to the world, should
in the lapse of fifty years have become out of print. His next
performances may, with sufficient trouble, be obtained. They are the
poems of 'Gebir', Chrysaor', the 'Phoeacans', &c, and the very high
encomiums passed upon 'Gebir' by Southey, with whom Landor was not
acquainted till some twelve years afterwards, were accounted as
sufficient fame by their author. Southey's eulogy of the poem appeared
in the Critical Review, to
the great anger of Gifford, whose translation of 'Juvenal' was by no
means so much praised in the same number. One of the most strikingly
characteristic facts in connexion with Mr Landor is, that while he has
declared his own doubts as to whether Nature intended him for a poet,
'because he could never please himself by anything he ever did of that
kind', it must be perfectly evident to everybody who knows his
writings, that he never took the least pains to please the public. The
consequences were almost inevitable.
After leaving Trinity, Mr. Landor passed some months in London,
leanring Italian and avoiding all society; he then retired to Swansea,
where he wrote 'Gebir' - lived in comparative solitude - made love -
and was happy.
The 'attitude' in which the critical literati of the time received
the poem of 'Gebir', was very much the same as though such a work had
never been published. A well-written critique, however, did appear as
one exception, in a northern provincial paper, in which Mr Landor was
compared, in certain respects, with Goethe; another we have also seen,
which was full of grandly eloquent and just expressions of appreciation
- printed, we believe, in Aberdeen, within two years since, and signed
G.G.; - but the earliest was written by Southey, as previously stated.
No doubt Mr Landor has read the latter, but it is his habit (and one
more common among authors of original genius than is at all suspected)
never to read critiques upon himself. His feeling towards this
department of literature may be estimated by his offer of a hot penny
roll and a pint of stout, for breakfast (!) to any critic wh could
write one of his Imaginary Conversations - an indigestible pleasantry
which horribly enraged more than one critic of the time. Of 'Gebir',
however, Coleridge was accustomed to speak in terms of great praise;
till one day he herd Southey speak of it with equal admiration, after
which Coleridge altered his mind - 'he did not admire it - he must have been
mistaken'.
A few biographical memoranda of Mr Landor will be found interesting,
previous to offering some remarks on his genius and works. During the
time he was studying Italian in London, after leaving Trinity, his
godfather, General Powell, was anxious that he should enter the army,
for which he seemed peculiarly adapted, excepting that he entertained
republican principles which 'would not do there'. This proposal being
negatived, his father offered to allow him £400 per annum, if he
would adopt the law and reside in the Temple; but declared that he
would allow him but little more than one-third of that sum, if he
refused. Of course Walter Landor well knew that he might have enjoyed a
gay London life with £400 per annum, in the Temple, and neglected
the law, as, here and there, a young gentleman of the Temple is apt to
do; he, however, preferred to avoid false pretences, accepted the
smaller income, and studied Italian.
Mr Landor wrote verses in Italian at this period, which were not very
good, yet not perhaps worse than Milton's. The poetry of Italy did not
captivate his more severely classical taste at first; he says it seemed
to him 'like the juice of grapes and melons left on yesterday's plate'.
He had just been reading Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Pindar. But his
opinion was altered directly he read Dante, which he did not do till
some years afterwards.
That his uncle was not so far wrong in thinking Landor well suited to a
military life, the following anecdote will serve to attest. - At the
breaking out of the Spanish war against the French, he was the first
Englishman who landed in Spain. He raised a few troops at his own
expense and conducted them from Corunna to Aguilar, the head quarters
of Gen. Blake, Viceroy of Gallicia. For this he received the thanks of
the Supreme Junta in the Madrid
Gazette, together with an acknowledgement of the donation of
20,000 reals from Mr Landor.
He returned the letters and documents, with his commission, to Don
Pedro Cevallos, on the subversion of the Constitution by Ferdinand -
telling Don Pedro that he was willing to aid a people in their
assertion of its liberties against the antagonist of Europe, but that
he could have nothing to do with a perjuror and traitor.
Mr Landor went to Paris in the beginning of the century, where he
witnessed the ceremony of Napoleon being made Consul for life, amidst
the acclamations of multitudes. He subsequently saw the detrhoned and
deserted Emperor pass through Tours on his way to embark, as he
intended, for America. Napoleon was attended only by a single servant,
and descended at the Prefecture, unrecognized by anybody except Landor.
The people of Tours were most hostile to Napoleon; Landor had always
felt a hatred towards him, and now he had but to point one finger at
him, and it would have done what all the artillery of twenty years of
war had failed to do. The people would have torn him to pieces. Need it
be said Landor was too 'good a hater', and too noble a man, to avail
himself of such an opportunity. He held his breath, and let the hero
pass. Perhaps, after all, there was no need of any of this hatred on
the part of Mr Landor, who, in common with many other excessively
wilful men, was probably as much exasperated at Napoleon's commanding
successes, as at his falling off from pure republican principles.
Howbeit, Landor's great hatred, and yet 'greater' forbearance are
hereby chronicled.

In 1806, Mr Landor sold several estates in Warwickshire which had been
in his family nearly seven hundred years, and purchased Lantony and
Comjoy in Monmouthshire, where he laid out nearly £70,000. Here
he made extensive improvements, giving employment daily, for many
years, to between twenty and thirty labourers in building and planting.
He made a road at his own expense, of eight miles long, and planted and
fenced half a million trees. The infamous behaviour of some tenants
caused him to leave country. At this time, he had a million more trees
all ready to plant, which, as he observed, 'were lost to the country by
driving me from it. I may speak of their
utility, if I must not of my own'. The two chief offenders were
brothers who rented farms of Mr Landor to the amount of £1,500
per annum, and were to introduce an improved system of Suffolk
husbandry. Mr Landor got no rent from them, but all manner of atrocious
annoyances. They even rooted up his trees, and destroyed whole
plantations. They paid nobody. When neighbours and workpeople applied
for money, Mr Landor says, 'they were referred to the Devil, with their
wives and families, while these brothers had their two bottles of wine
upon the table. As for the Suffolk system of agriculture, wheat was
sown
upon the last of May, and cabbages for winter food were planted in
August or September. Mr Landor eventually remained master of the field,
and drove his tormentors across the seas; but so great was his disgust
at these circumstances that he resolved to leave England. Beofre his
departure he cause his house, which had cost him some £8,000, to
be taken down, that his son might never have the chance of similar
vexations in that place.
In 1811, Mr Landor married Julia, the daughter of J. Tuillier de
Malaperte, descendant and representative of the Baron de Neuve-ville,
first gentleman of the bedchamber to Charles the Eighth. He went to
reside in Italy in 1815, and during several years occupied the Palazzo
Medici, in Florence. Subsequently he purchased the beautiful and
romantic villa of Count Gherardesca at Fiesole, with its gardens and
farms, scarcely a quarter of an hour's walk from the ancient villa of
Lorenzo de' Medici, and resided there many years in comparative
solitude.

Of the difference between the
partialities of the public, and the eventual judgements of the people;
between a deeply-founded fame and an ephemeral interest, few more
striking examples will perhaps be discovered in future years than in
the solitary course of Walter Savage Landor amidst the various 'lights
of his day'. He has incontestably displayed original genius as a
writer; the highest critical faculty - that sympathy with genius and
knowledge which can only result from imagination and generous love of
truth - and also a fine scholarship in the spirit as well as the letter
of classical attainments. But the public, tacitly, has denied his
claims, or worse - admitted them with total indifference, - letting
fall from its benumbed fingers, work after work, not because any one
ventured to say, or perhaps even to think, the books were unworthy, but
because the hands were cold. A writer of original genius may be popular
in his lifetime, as sometimes occurs, by means of certain talents and
tacts comprehended in his genius; by the aid of startling novelties, or
by broad and general effects; and by the excitement of adventitious
circumstances; - on which ground is to be worked the problem of Lord
Byron's extensive popularity with the very same daily and yearly
reading public that made mocks and mows at Coleridge, and Wordsworth,
and Shelley, and Keats. But, as a general rule, the originality of a man,
say
and
do
what
he may, is necessarily in itself an argument against
his rapid popularity. In the case of Mr Landor, however, other causes
than the originality of his faculty have opposed his favour with the
public. He has the most select audiences perhaps, - the fittest,
fewest, - of any distinguished author of the day; and this of his
choice. 'Give me', he said in one of his prefaces, 'ten accomplished
men
for readers, and I am content'; - and the event does not by any means
so far as we could desire, outstrip the modesty, or despair, or
disdain,
of this aspiration. He writes criticism for critics, and poetry for
poets: his drama, when he is dramatic, will suppose neither pit nor
gallery, not critics, nor dramatic laws. He is not a publican among
poets - he does not sell his Amreeta cups upon the highway.He delivers
them rather with the dignity of a giver, to ticketed persons; analysing
their flavour and fragrance with a learned delicacy, and an appeal to
the esoteric. His very spelling of English is uncommon and theoretic.
He has a vein of humour which by its own nature is pecularly subtle and
evasive; he therefore refines upon it, by his art, in order to prevent
anybody discovering it without a grave, solicitous, and courtly
approach, which is unspeakably ridiculous to all the parties concerned,
and which no doubt the author secretly enjoys. And as if poetry were
not, in English, a sufficiently unpopular dead languages, he has had
recourse to writing poetry in Latin; with dissertations on the Latin
tongue, to fence it out doubly from the populace. 'Odi profanum vulgus,
et arceo'.
Whether Mr Landor writes Latin or English, poetry or prose, he does it
all with a certain artistic composure, as if he knew what he was doing,
and respected the cunning of his right hand. At times he displays an
equal respect for his wilfulness. In poetry, his 'Gebir', the
'Phocaeans' and some other performances take a high classic rank. He
can put out extraordinary power both in description and situation; but
the vitality, comprehended in the power, does not overflow along the
inferior portions of the work, so as to sustain them to the level of
the reader's continued attention. the poet rather builds up to his own
elevations than carries them out and on: and the reader passes from
admiration to admiration, by separate estates or shocks, and not by a
continuity of interest through the intervals of emotion. Thus it
happens that his best dramatic works, -those, the impression of which
on the mind is most definite and excellent, - are fragmentary; and that
his complete dramas are nt often read through twice, even by readers
who applaud them, but for the sake of a particular act or scene.
A remark should be made on Mr Landor's blank verse, in which the poems
just named, and several others are written. It is the very best of the
regular syllable class, the versification of 'numbers', as they have
been characteristically called by the schools. His blank verse is not
only the most regular that ever was written, but it is the most sweet,
and far less monotonous than we should expect of a musical system which
excluded occasional discords. It has all the effect of the most
melodious rhyming heroic verse: indeed, it often gives the impression
of elegiac verses in rhyme. As blank verse it is a very bad model.
There is more freedom in his dramatic verse, and always the purest
style.
His dramatic works (except the compact little scenes entitled
'Pentalogia', which are admirable) are written upon an essentially
undramatic principle; or, more probably, on no principle at all. Mr
Landor well knows 'all the laws', and they seem to provoke his will to
be lawless. In this species of drama-looking composition he displays at
times the finest passion, the most pure and perfect style of dramatic
dialogue, and an intensity of mental movements, with their invisible,
undeclared, yet necessarily tragic results.ì; all of which
proves him to possess the most wonderful three-fourths of a great
dramatic genius which ever appeared in the world. But the fourth part
is certainly wanting by way of making good his ground to the eyes, and
ears, and understanding of the masses. In his Andrea of Hungary the
action does not commence till the last scene of the third act; and is
not continued in the first scene of the fourth! Instead of the expected
continuation, after all this patience, the confounded reader has his
breath taken away by the sauntering entrance of Boccaccio - the
novelist - accompanied by Fiametta, who having nothing whatever to do
with the drama, the former sings her little song! This extremely
free-and-easy style of treading the boards is so very new and
delightful that it excites the idea of continuing the scene by the
introduction of the Genius of the Drama, with a paper speech coming out
of his mouth, on which is inscribed the Laws of Concentration and
Continuity, the Laws of Progressive action and the Art of construction.
To whom, Enter the Author, with a
cast-net. He makes his cast to admiration; trips up the heels of
the Genius of the Drama, and leaves it sprawling. It is his own doing.
In whatever Mr Landor writes, his power, when he puts it forth, is of
the first order. He is classical in the highest sense. His conceptions
stand out, clearly cut and fine, in a magnitude and nobility as far as
possible removed from the small and sickly vagueness common to this
century of letters. If he seems obscure at times, it is from no
infirmity or inadequacy of thought or word, but from extreme
concentration, and involution in brevity - for a short string can be
tied in a knot, as well as a long one. He cen be tender, as the strong
can best be; and his pathos, when it comes, is profound. His
descriptions are full and startling; his thoughts, self-produced and
bold; and he has the art of taking a commonplace under a new aspect,
and of leaving the Roman brick, marble. In marble indeed, he seems to
work: for there is an angularity in the workmanship, whether of prose
or verse, which the very exquisiteness of the polish renders more
conspicuous. You may complain too of hearing the chisel: but after all,
you applaud the work - it is a work well done. The elaboration produces
no sense of heaviness, - the severity of the outline does not militate
against beauty; - if it is cold, it is also noble - if not impulsive,
it is suggestive. As a writer of Latin poems, he ranks with our most
successful scholars and poets; having less harmony and majesty than
Milton had, - when he aspired to the species of 'Life in Death',
- but more variety and majesty of utterance. Mr Landor's English prose
writings possess most of the characteristics of his poetry: only they
are more perfect in their class. His 'Pericles and Aspasia', and
'Pentameron' are books for the world and for all time, whenever the
world and time shall come to their senses about them: complete in
beauty of sentiment and subtlety of criticism. His general style is
highly scholastic and elegant, - his sentences have articulations, if
such an expression may be permitted, of very excellent proportions.
And, abounding in striking images and thoughts, he is remarkable for
making clear the ground around them, and for lifting them, like statues
to pedestals, where they may be seen most distinctly, and strike with
the most enduring though often the most gradual impression. This is the
case both in his prose works and his poetry. It is more conspicuously
true of some of his smaller poems, which for quiet classic grace and
tenderness, and exquisite care in their polish, may best be compared
with beautiful cameos and vases of the antique.
Two works should be mentioned - one of which is only known to a few
among his admirers, and the other not at all. Neither of them were
published, and though printed they were very little circulated. The
first is entitled, 'Poems from the Arabic and Persian'. They pretended
to be translations, but were written by Landor for the pleasure of
misleading certain orientalists and other leanred men. In this he
succeeded, and for the first time in the known history of such hoaxes,
not to the discredit of the credulous, for the poems are extremely
beautiful, and breathe the true oriental spirit throughout. They are
ornate in fancy, - graceful, and full of unaffected tenderness. They
were printed in 1800, with many extremely erudite notes; in writing
which, the author, no doubt, laughed very much to himself at the
critical labour and searching they would excite. The other production
is called 'A Satire upon Satirists, and Admonition to Detractors',
printed in 1836. It contins many just indignations, terrible
denunciations, and cleaving blows against those who used not many years
since to make a rabid crusade upon all genius; but the satire
occasionally makes attacks upon some who do not deserve to be so
harshly treated by a brother author: and we cannot but rejoice that
this satire (in its present state) has not been published.
Mr Landor's wit and humour are of a very original kind, as previously
remarked. Perhaps in none of his writings does their peculiarity occur
so continuously as in a series of Letters, entitled 'High and Low Life
in Italy'. Every sarcasm, irony, jest, or touch of humour, is secreted
beneath the skin of each tingling member of his sentences. His wit and
his humour are alike covered up amidst various things, apparently
intended to lead the reader astray, as certain birds are wont to do
when you approach the nests that contain their broods. Or, the main
jests and knotty points of a paragraph are planed down to the smooth
level of the rest of the sentences, so that the reader may walk over
them without knowing anything of the matter. All this may be natural to
his genius; it may also result from pride, or perversity. So far from
seeking the public, his genius has displayed a sort f apathy, if not
antipathy, to popularity; therefore, the public must court it, if they
would enjoy it; to possess yourself of his wit you must scrutinize; to
be let into the secret of his humour you must advance 'pointing the
toe'. such are the impressions derivable from Mr Landor's writings. In
private social intercourse nothing of the kind is apparent, and there
are few men whose conversation is more unaffected, namely, pleasing,
and instructive.
The imagination of Mr Landor is richly graphic, classical and subtly
refined. In portraying a character, his imagination identifies itself
with the mentality and with the emotions of its inner being, and all
those idiosyncracies which may be said to exist between a man and
himself., but with which few, if anybody else, have any business. In
other respects, most of his characters - especially those of his own
invention - might live, think, move, and have their being in space, so
little does their author trouble himself with their corporeal
conditions. Whether it be that their author feels his own physique so strongly that it does
not ocur to him that any one else can need such a thing - he will find
all that for them - or that it is the habit of his genius to abstract
itself from corporeal realities (partly from the perverse love a man
continually has of being his own 'opposite'), and ascend into a more
subtle element of existence, - certain it is that many of his
characters are totally without material or definite form; appear to live nowhere, and
upon nothing, and to be very independent agents, to whom the practical
action seldom or never occurs. 'They think, therefore they are'. They
feel, and know (they are apt too often to knw as much as their author)
therefore they are characters. But they are usually without bodily
substance; and such form as they seem to have, is an abstraction which
plays round them, but might go off in air at any time, and the loss be
scarcely apparent. The designs of his larger works, as wholes, are also
deficient in compactness of form, precision of outline, and
condensation. They often seem wild, not at all intellectually, but from
ungoverned will. It is difficult not to arrive at conclusions of this
kind - though different minds will, of course, see differently - after
a careful study of the dramas of Andrea
of
Hungary, Giovanna of Naples,
and
Fra Rupert; the Pericles and Aspasia, the Pentemeron and Pentalogia, &c.
The very title of the 'Imaginary Conversations' gives a strong
foretaste of Mr Landor's predominating ideality, and dismissal of
mortal bonds and conditions. The extraordinary production last named
are as thoguh their author had been rarified while listening to the
conversation, or th double soliloquies, of august Shades; all of which
he had carefully written down on resuming his corporeality, and where
his memory failed him he had supllied the deficiency with some sterling
stuff of his own. The Landorean 'peeps' seen through these ethereal
dialogues and soliloquies of the mighty dead, are seldom to be
mistaken; and though hardly at times in accordance with their company,
are seldom unworthy of the highest.
As a partial exception to some of the foregoing remarks should be
mentioned the 'Examination of William Shakespeare before Sir thomas
Lucy, Knt. touching Deer-stealing'. Of all the thousands of books that
have been issued from the press about Shakespeare, this one of Mr
Landor's is by far the most admirable. It is worth them all. There is
the high-water mark of genius upon every page, lit by as true a sun as
ever the ocean mirrored. Perfect and inimitable from beginning to end,
that it has not become the most popular of all the books relating to
Shakespeare, is only to be accounted for by some perversity or dullness
of the public. The book is, certainly, not read. There is great love
and reading bestowed upon every cant about Shakespeare, and much
interst has been shown in all the hoaxes. Perhaps the public thought
this book was authentic.
Other stars await other
discoveries. Few and solitary, and wide asunder, are those who
calculate their relative distances, their mysterious influences, their
glorious magnitude, and their studendous height. 'Tis so, believe me,
with the truest and best poetry. Homer they say was blind; he might
have been ere he died; that he sat among the blind, we are sure . . .
Be patient! From the higher heavens of poetry, it is long before the
radiance of the brightest star can reach the world below. We hear that
one man finds out one beauty, another man finds out another, placing
his observatory and instruments on the poet's grave. The worms must
have eaten us before it is rightly known what we are It is only when we
are skeletons that we are boxed and ticketed, and prized and
shown.
Landor, 'Examination of William Shakespeare'.
In an age of criticism like this, when to 'take' a position over a man
and his work is supposed to include proportionable superior powers of
judgement, though not one discovery, argument, or searching remark, be
adduced in proof; when analysis is publicly understood to mean
everything that can be done for the attainment of a correct estimate,
and the very term, alone, of synthesis looks pedantic and outre; and when any anonymous young
man may gravely seat himself, in the fancy of his unknowing readers,
far above an author who may have published works - of genius, learning,
or knowledge and experience, at the very period that his We Judge was perhaps learning to
write at school, - it is only becming in an attempt like that of the
present paper, to disclaim all assumption of finality of judgement upon
a noble veteran of establisehd genius, concerning whom there has never
yet been one philosophically elaborated criticism. To be the first to
'break ground' upon the broad lands of the the authors of characters
and scenes from real life, is often rather a perilous undertaking for
any known critic who values his reputation; but to unlock the secret
chambers of an ethereal inventiveness, and pronounce at once upon its
contents, would only manifest the most short-sighted presumption.
Simply to have unlocked such chambers for the entrance of others, were
task enough for one contemporary.
Any sincere and mature opinions of the master of an art are always
valuable, and not the less so when commenting upon established
reputations, or those about which a contest still exists. We may thus
be shaken in our faith, or confirmed in it. Mr Landor's mode of
expressing his opinion often amounts to appealing to an inner sense for
a corroboration of the truth. He says, in a letter to a friend, 'I
found the "Faery Queen" the most delightful book in the world to fall
asleep upon by the seaside. Geoffrey Chaucer always kept me wide awake,
and beat at a distance all other English poets but Shakespeare and
Milton. In many places Keats approaches him'. After remarking on the
faults and occasional affectations discoverable in two or three of the
earliest poems of that true and beautiful genius, Mr Landor adds that
he considers 'no poet (always excepting Shakespeare) displays so many
happy expressions, or so vivid a fancy as Keats. A few hours in the
Paecile with the Tragedians would have made him all he wanted -
majestically sedate. I wonder if any remorse has overtaken his
murderers'.
Mr Landor is not at all the product of the present age; he scarcely
belongs to it; he has no direct influence upon it: but he has been an
influence to some of its best teachers, and to some of the most refined
illustrators of its vigorous spirit. For the rest - for the duty, the
taste, or the favour of posterity - when a succession of publics shall
have slowly accumulated a residuum of 'golden opinions' in the shape of
pure admiring verdicts of competent minds, then only, if ever, will he
attain his just estimation in the not altogether impartial roll of
Fame. If ever? - the words fell from the pen - and the manly voice of
him to whom they were applied, seems to call from his own clear
altitude, 'Let the words remain'. For in the temple of posterity there
have hitherto always appeared some immortalities which had better have
burnt out, while some great works, or names, or both, have been
suffered to drift away into oblivion. That such is likely to be the
fate of the writings of Walter Savage Landor, nobody can for a moment
believe; but were it so destined, and he could foresee the result, one
can imagine his taking a secret pleasure in this resolution of his
works into their primitive elements.
*§° WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR/
ENGLAND/ Landor/ Gualtiero Savage/ / Inghilterra/ Firenze/
17
Settembre/ 1864/ Anni 90/ 879/ Walter Savage Landor,
l'Angleterre/
GL23777/1 N° 348 Burial 19/09, Rev Pendleton/ Freeman, 223/
Thomas Adolphus Trollope,
What I Remember, II.244-262, notes Landor
and the Garrows knew each other well from Devon days, gives Landor's
letter
about
Kate Field's Atlantic Monthly article mentions the Alinari
photograph
of himself/ NDNB entry/ Giuliana
Artom
Treves,
Golden Ring, pp. 38-53
°=Gen.
Pier Lamberto Negroni Bentivoglio/ IN
MEMORY
OF/
WALTER
SAVAGE
LANDOR/
BORN 30th OF JANUARY 1775/ DIED 17th OF
SEPTEMBER
1864/ AND THOU HIS FLORENCE TO THY TRUST/ RECEIVE AND KEEP/ KEEP SAFE
HIS
DEDICATED DUST/ HIS SACRED SLEEP/ SO SHALL THY LOVERS COME FROM FAR/
MIX
WITH THY NAME/ MORNING STAR WITH EVENING STAR/ HIS FAULTLESS FAME/ A.G.
SWINBURNE/ F9E/
Barfucci
says
original
slab
replaced
in 1946

WALTER SAVAGE LANDOR WEBSITE: Recordings of Gebir I, Gebir II || Essay 'Walter Savage Landor' in New Spirit of the Age ||
Jean Field, 'Walter Savage Landor's Warwick'
||
'Black and Red
Letter Chaucer' || Kate
Field,
Atlantic Montly, 'The Last Days of Walter Savage Landor' ||
Mark Roberts, 'The Inscription on the
Grave of Walter Savage Landor' ||
Alison Levy, 'The Widow of Walter Savage
Landor' ||
Kristin Bragadottir, 'William Morris
and Daniel Willard Fiske' (Villa Landor) ||
Piero Fusi, 'A. Henry Savage Landor'.
FRANCES
TROLLOPE (NPG
3906)
See 'Iron Chain: Golden Ring'
No
sooner did the
Housekeeper see them than she ran out of the room in great haste, and
immediately returned with a pot of holy water and a bunch of hyssop,
and said, 'Signor Licentiate, take this and sprinkle the room, lest
some enchanter, of the many these books abound with, should enchant us,
in revenge for what we intend to do in banishing them out of the
world!' The Priest smiled at the Housekeeper's simplicity, and ordered
the Barber to reach him the books, one by one, that they might see what
they treated of; for, perhaps they might find some that did not deserve
to be chastized by
fire.
Don
Quixote
orne's A New Spirit of the Age discusses
Fanny Trollope in an essay with several other novelists. And
the writer of the essay is extremely disparaging of her, so much so
that Horne expostulates in a footnote. Who wrote the essay? I suspect
Elizabeth Barrett Browning, touched to the quick by the episode in Jonathan Jefferson Whitelaw where a
heroine discovers she is part Black and consequently overdoses on
laudanum. Too close to the bone.
The class to which [Mrs Trollope]
belongs is, fortunately, very small; but it will always be recruited
from the ranks of the unscrupulous, so long as a corrupt taste is
likely to yield a trifling profit. She owes everything to that
audacious contempt of public opinion, which is the distinguishing mark
of persons who are said to stick at
nothing. Nothing but this sticking at nothing could have
produced some of the books she has written, in which her wonderful
impunity of face is so remarkable. Her constitutional coarseness is the
natural element of a low popularity, and is sure to pass for
cleverness, shrewdness and strength, where cultivated judgement and
chaste inspiration would be thrown away.*
______________
*Still, we submit
that the critic does not admit enough on the other side. We think Mrs.
Trollope is clever, shrewd,
and strong. H.
______________
Her books of travel are crowded with plebeian
criticisms on works of art and the usages of courts, and are doubtless
held in great esteem by her admirers, who love to see such things
overhauled and draged down to their own level. The book on America is
of a different class. The subject exactly suited to her style and her
taste, and people looked on at the fun as they would at a scramble of
sweeps in the kennel; while the reflecting few thought it a little
unfair in Mrs. Trollope to find fault with the manners of the
Americans. Happy for her she had such a topic to begin with. Had she
commenced her literary career with Austria or France, in all likelihood
she would have ended it there.
But it is to her novels she is chiefly indebted to her current
reputation; and it is here her defects are most glaringly exhibited.
She cannot adapt herself to the characterization requisite in a work of
fiction: she cannot go out of herself: she serves up everything with
the same sauce: the predominant flavour is Trollope still. The plot is
always preposterous, and the actors in it seem to be eternally bullying
each other. She takes a strange delight in the hideous and revolting,
and dwells with gusto upon the sins of vulgarity. Her sensitiveness
upon this point is striking. She never omits an opportunity of
detailing the faults of low-bred people, and even goes out of her way
to fasten the stigma upon others who ought to have been more gently
tasselled. Then her low pwople are sunk deeper than the lowest depths,
as if they had been bred in and in, the last dregs. Nothing can exceed
the vulgarity of Mrs. Trollope's mob of characters, except the
vulgarity of her select aristocracy. That is transcendant - it caps the
climax.
We have heard it urged on behalf of Mrs. Trollope that her novels are,
at all events, drawn from life. So are sign-paintings. It is not great
proof of their truth that centaurs and griffins do not run loose
through her pages, and that her men and women have neither hoofs and
tails. The tawdriest waxworks, girt up in paste and spangles, are also
'drawn from life'; but there ends the resemblance.
On behalf of Mrs Trollope we could add that she wrote the first
anti-slave novel in Jonathan
Jefferson Whitlaw, a major novel against the abuse of children
in Michael Armstrong Factory Boy,
and
a
major
novel
against clergy abuse in The
Vicar
of Wrexhill. While her
commissioning of Hiram Powers in Cincinnati to do waxworks of Dante's Commedia was the start of his
internationally distinguished career as a sculptor, his 'Greek Slave'
at the centre of the 1851 Crystal Palace Exhibition. She is coeval with
Jane Austen. She is deeper than Jane Austen. Her style is Regency, her
sentiments of the Civil Rights era. It was under her roof,
in Room 36 of the Villino Trollope, that George Eliot wrote Romola.
*§ FRANCES
(MILTON)
TROLLOPE (1780-1863)/ ENGLAND/
Trolloape
[Trollope]
nata
Milton/
Vedova
Francesca/ Guglielmo/ Inghilterra/
Firenze/
6 Ottobre/ 1863/ Anni 84/ 849/ Françoise Veuve Trolloope,
l'Angleterre,
fille de Revd. Guillaume Milton, et de Marie, née Gressley, son
épouse/ FRANCESCAE TROLLOPE/ QUOD MORTALE FUIT/ HIC IACET/ .
.
. / MEMORIA/ NULLUM MARMOR QUAERIT/ APUD STAPLETON/ IN AGRO
SOMERSET
ANGLORUM/ A.D. 1780 NATA/ FLORENTIAE/ TUMULUM A.D.1863/ NACTA EST/ On
the
Trollopes
in
Florence,
see Giuliana Artom Treves, Golden Ring,
passim, ° archival holdings; Thomas Adolphus Trollope writes the
Latin
of the inscriptions for his mother, his wife, his father-in-law;
GL23777/1
N° 337 Burial 08/10 Age 84 Rev Pendleton / Thomas
Adolphus
Trollope,
What I Remember, I & II/ NDNB entries
for
Trollopes, etc./ F11E


Tom, Fanny, Bice, and
Theodosia
Trollope
in Villino Trollope, Piazza
dell'Indipendenza
See also Fanny Trollope in America and Italy: http://www.florin.ms/trollope.html
ELIZABETH
BARRETT
BROWNING/
MISS E.B. BARRETT

As one who drinks from a charmed
cup
Of foaming and sparkling and murmuring wine
Which a mighty Enchantress, filling up,
Invites to love with her lips divine.
Shelley
he
latter lady, or 'fair shade' - whicever she may be - is not known
personally, to anybody, we had almost said; but her poetry is known to
a highly intellectual class, and she 'lives' in constant correspondence
with many of the most eminent persons of the time. When, however, we
consider the many strange and ingenious conjectures that are made in
after years concerning authors who appeared but little among their
contemporaries, of of whose biography little is actually known, we
should not be in the least surprised, could we lift up our ear out of
our grave a century hence, to hear some learned Thebans expressing
shrewd doubts as to whether such an individual as Miss E.B. Barrett had
ever really existed. Letters and notes, and exquisite English lyrics,
and perhaps a few elegant Latin verses, and spirited translations from
Aeschylus, might all be discovered under that name; but this would not
prove that such a lady had ever dwelt among us. Certain admirable and
erudite prose articles on the 'Greek Chrsitian Poets' might likewise be
ascertained by the exhumations of sundry private letters and documents,
touching periodical literature, to have been from the hand of that same
'Valerian'; but neither the poetry, nor the prose, not the delightfully
gossiping notes to fair freinds, not the frank correspondence with
scholars, such as Lady Jane Grey might have written to Roger Ascham -
no, not even if the great-grandson of some learned Jewish doctor could
show a note in Hebrew (quite a likely thing really to be extant), with
the same signature, darkly translated by four letters, - nay, though he
should display as a relic treasured in his family, the very pen, with
its oblique Hebraic nib, that wrote it - not any one, nor all of those
things coud be sufficient to demonstrate the fact that such a lady had
really adorned the present century.
In such chiaroscuro, therefore, as
circumstances permit, we will endeavour to offer sufficient grounds for
our reader's belief, to the end that posterity may at least have the
best authorities and precedents we can furnish. Confined entirely to
her own apartment, and almost hermetically sealed, in consequence of
some extremely delicate state of health, the poetess of whom we write
is scarcely seen by any but her own family. But though thus separated
from the world - and often, during many weeks at a time, in darkness
almost equal to that of night, Miss Barrett has yet found means by
extraordinary inherent energies to develope her inward nature; to give
vent to the soul in a successful struggle with its destiny while on
earth; and to attain and master more knowledge and accomplishments than
are usually within the power of those of either sex who possess every
adventitious opportunity, as well as health and industry. Five years of
this imprisonment she has now endured, not with vain repinings, though
deeply conscious of the loss of external nature's beauty; but with
resignation, with patience, with cheerfulness, and generous sympathies
towards the world without; - with indefatigable 'work' by thought, by
book, by the pen, and with devout faith, and adoration, and a high and
hopeful waiting for the time when this mortal frame 'putteth on
immortality'.
The period when a strong
prejudice existed against learned ladies and 'blues' has gone by, some
time since; yet in case any elderly objections may still exist on this
score, or that some even of the most liberal-minded readers may
entertain a degree of doubt as to whether a certain austere
exclusiveness and ungenial pedantry might infuse a slight tinge into
the character of ladies possessing Miss Barrett's attainments, a few
words may be added to prevent erroneous impressions on this score.
Probably no living individual has a more extensive and diffuse
acquaintance with literature - that of the present day inclusive - than
Miss Barrett. Although she has read Plato, in the oriiginal, from
beginning to end, and the Hebrew Bible from Genesis to Malachi (nor
suffered her course to be stopped by
the Chaldean), yet there is probably not a single good romance of the
most romantic kind in whose marvellous and impossibile scene she has
not delighted, over the fortunes of whose immaculate or incredible
heroes and heroines she has not wept; not a clever novel or fanciful
sketch of our own day, over the brightest pages of which she has not
smiled inwardly, or laughed outright, just as their authors themselves
could have desired. All of this, our readers may be assured, that we
believe to be as strictly authentic as the very existence of the lady
in question, although, as we have already confessed, we have no
absolute knowledge of this fact. But lest the reader should exclaim,
'Then, after all, there
really may be no such person!' we should bear witness to having been
shown a letter of Miss Mitford's to a friend, from which it was plainly
to be inferred that she had actually seen and conversed with her. The
date has unfortunately escaped us.
He compares Mrs. Norton and Miss Barrett:
The prominent characteristics of
these two poetesses may be designated as the struggles of woman towards
happiness, and the struggles of a sould towards heaven. The one is
oppressed with a sense of injustice, and feels the need of human love;
the other is troubled with a sense of mortality, and aspires to
identify herself with ethereal existences. The one has a certain tinge
of morbid despondency taking the tone of complaint and the
amplificaiton of private griefs; the other too often displays an
energetic morbidity on the subject of death, together with a certain
predilection for 'terrors'. The imagination of Mrs. Norton is chiefly
occupied with domestic feelings and images, and breathes melodious
plaints or indignations over the desecrations of her sex's loveliness;
that of Miss Barrett often wanders amidst the supernatural darkness of
Calvary sometimes with anguish and tears of blood, sometimes like one
who echoes the songs of triumphal choirs. Both possess not only great
mental energies, but that description of strength which springs from a
fine nature, and manifests itself in productions which evidently
originated in genuine impulses of feeling. The subjects they both
choose appear spontaneous, and not resulting from study or imitation,
though cast into careful moulds of art. The one records and laments the
actual; the other creates and exults in the ideal. Both are excellent
artists: the one dealing with subjects of domestic interest; the other
in designs from sacred subjects, poems of religious tendency, or of the
supernatural world. Mrs Norton is beautifully clear and intelligible in
her narrative and course of though and feeling; Miss Barrett has great
invenitveness, but not an equal peer in construction. The one is all
womanhood; the other all wings. Mrs Norton is strong in actual
experiences, and her smpathies are carried beyond them, even into the
hard and painful scenes of juvenile labours, as evidenced in her 'Voice
from the Factories', first published in 1836. Miss Barrett is rich in
the memory of early experiences, but more rich in imaginations and
ethereal aspirations, and would shrink from the contemplation of
unrefined realities. The one writes from the dictates of the human
heart in all the eloquence of beauty and individuality; the other like
an inspired priestess - not without a most truthful heart, but a heart
that is devoted to religion, and whose individuality is cast upward in
the divine afflatus, and dissolved, and carried off in
the recipient breath of angelic ministrants.
One reason for Elizabeth not having admitted Richard 'Hengist' Horne to
her presence, though being perfectly willing to collaborate in
a
lively
correspondence
with him on his work for the report
to the Royal Commission on the Labour of Children in Mines and
Factories, as well as towards the production of this book, is that she
heard he was bald. Somewhere she remarks that a bald Hamlet is
unthinkable! But was not Shakespeare bald? This is Margaret Gillies'
portrait of 'Hengist' Horne (NPG
2168). Instead Elizabeth
Barrett proposed, in Lady
Geraldine's Courtship, to Tennyson and to Browning.
*§ ELIZABETH BARRETT BROWNING (1806-1861)/
JAMAICA/ENGLAND/ 79. Barrett Browning/ Elisabetta/ /
Inghilterra/
Firenze/ 29 Giugno/ 1861/ Anni 45 [incorrect, 55]/ 737/ Elisabeth
Barrett
Browning, l'Angleterre, agé de 45 ans/ [marble with leading,
design,
Lord Leighton, execution, Luigi Giovanozzi (1791-1870), sculptor of
Duchess
of Albany's tomb, Santa Croce, who signs the work to the bottom left]/
GL23777/1
N°293 Burial 01/07 Rev O'Neill; Anthony Webb: heart attack,
morphine
poisoning; Freeman, 236-23/ NDNB article /Henderson/ E.B.B./
OB.1861./E12I
/ FRANCESCO GIOVANNOZZI FECE
[See Biblioteca e Bottega Fioretta Mazzei
for books by and about Elizabeth Barrett Browning]

Harp shown with broken slave
shackle
at left, flowers at right.
See also Elizabeth Barrett Browning
Website: http://www.florin.ms/ebbwebsite.html
FLORIN
WEBSITE
©
JULIA BOLTON HOLLOWAY,
AUREO
ANELLO ASSOCIATION, 1997-2010: FLORENCE'S
'ENGLISH'
CEMETERY
|| BIBLIOTECA E
BOTTEGA FIORETTA MAZZEI
|| ELIZABETH
BARRETT BROWNING || FLORENCE
IN SEPIA || BRUNETTO
LATINO, DANTE
ALIGHIERI AND GEOFFREY
CHAUCER
|| E-BOOKS
|| ANGLO-ITALIAN
STUDIES || CITY
AND BOOK
I,
II,
III,
IV || NON-PROFIT
GUIDE TO COMMERCE IN
FLORENCE
|| AUREO
ANELLO, CATALOGUE

Florentine Lily on Elizabeth
Barrett
Browning's Tomb